Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

42401Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: future yoga and Ahriman

Expand Messages
  • dottie zold
    Oct 10, 2009
      Well, we have the question of what came first, the seed or the tree? I think it was the Rabbi that said 'the tree of course'. And so in this thinking, where we exist in the physical world, and are in it but not of it, the spiritual needs the material in order to develop this thinking rightfully...for this we are transforming.
      And this Yoga of Light seems to be inherent in our thinking. This breathing in Light, this breathing in Thinking, meeting the beings of the higher worlds, properly, seems to be in the warmth, light, and life...and this it is that activates...not a good word....engages, engages our souls endeavor to transform these physical organs into their new attainment for our future development....or so I am thinking...and just as in Yoga of old, it is a cultivation, a daily if we can, cultivation of this thinking that becomes enlightened through the warmth, light, and life.
      Mikko, what did you mean by Ahrimanistic clairovoyance...for that term 'clairovoyance' I understand to be a 'seeing' not a sensing into....but maybe it can be a sensing into the mechanics of the thought if that is how you use the term.
      All good things,

      "If there is something more powerful than destiny, this must be the human being who bears destiny unshaken." Rudolf Steiner

      --- On Fri, 10/9/09, Kim <kimgm@...> wrote:

      From: Kim <kimgm@...>
      Subject: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: future yoga and Ahriman
      To: anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Friday, October 9, 2009, 10:28 PM

      As I understand it, there is no clairvoyance connected with this at all,
      it's pure thought to free you from material thinking, so it's the
      opposite of Ahrimanism.

      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, Mikko Nuuttila
      <bellmeine@...> wrote:
      > Steiner says the yoga of the future will be detached from the senses
      and in the realm of pure thought.
      > Isn't this somewhat like the definition of Ahrimanic clairvoyance by
      him, where you for instance see the structure of the atom as an exercise
      in thinking without physically being able to view it? I saw the
      connection this morning after a night's sleep.
      > Is this connection coincidental, for Steiner does not really advocate
      > On the other hand, we must be able to learn to deal with Him, which is
      taking him in by showing astonishment at His achievements to maintain a
      natural balance between forces, it is said.
      > Mikko


      Yahoo! Groups Links

      <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

      <*> Your email settings:
          Individual Email | Traditional

      <*> To change settings online go to:
          (Yahoo! ID required)

      <*> To change settings via email:

      <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

      <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

    • Show all 39 messages in this topic