Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

37225Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Madonna 4 minutes

Expand Messages
  • dottie zold
    May 1, 2008
    • 0 Attachment

      Sandor I think Time is endless. I think there is a living into Time and bending with it rather than trying to control it that seems to speak to me most. Time is eternal. I think if we sense into the Time Beings and then our own sense of human time we can have an imagination of Time weaving, a weaving of pictures, a weaving of movement towards our development. And that's what matters, our development towards our task of birthing the I Am, the Ego. There's something about a different understanding of Time that already lives within us when we consider we, our, birth stars and planets have been imprinted within us since birth.

       

      I woke up this morning with the Ego on my mind. I was wondering if we can truly have a living imagination towards what it means to birth our Egos, our I Ams? What does that look like, what does that require? And not just in words, but in experiential understandings. Not mysticm rather in consciousness. I mean we are responsible for birthing our Egos. I mean that can be rather heavy if thought of from an emotional or a thinking level. But from the thinkingheart level it is not heavy, it is what it is and we can have a feel for this, and imagination for this. Contemplating this when we reach the right moment in ourselves to be contemplating such things can be truly deepening towards the cosmic beings of our world.

       

      All good things,

      Dottie

      --- On Thu, 5/1/08, Albert Sándor <montek@...> wrote:

      From: Albert Sándor <montek@...>
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Madonna 4 minutes
      To: anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008, 3:41 AM

      The message is: Time is ticking. If you want to live, do it now. Grab a boy, grab a girl. Even thought is just flesh and bone you kiss, it is this what you have.
       
       
      OK, am I too judgemental here ? Is it just my paranoid mind "ensnared" by too much antroposophy ?
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:37 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Madonna 4 minutes

      Time. Lucifer is afraid to be trapped in time. He desires to get back to the timeless sphere he was cast down from. He desires to preserve the perishable in the unchanging reality of the higher worlds. Love (eros) is intoxication with the beauty of the perishable, the ever changing physical world.
       
      "When men began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them,  the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal ; his days will be a hundred and twenty years."

       The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown. "

       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:21 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Madonna 4 minutes

      OK, I see two artists, stars, stars are bright, right ? Bright is light. Light is Lux. Lux is brought  to us. Luciferos.
      See the ahrimanic elementals following their steps, as if they would like to catch them.
      The kissing pairs are shown as in an anatomy book, disected, emphasising the flesh and bone.
       
      The words are about "4 minutes two save a world, grab a boy, grab a girl". Love is supposed to save the world. But in the same time love is demasked as belonging to the flesh.
       
      I was wondering, to what degree is this video conscious of what it depicts.
       
      Feel free to give your understanding.
       
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Andrei O.
      Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:51 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sacrafice


      is this a big deal of... of what?


      ----- Original Message ----
      From: Albert Sándor <montek@astralnet. ro>
      To: anthroposophy_ tomorrow@ yahoogroups. com
      Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:33:56 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sacrafice

      Ok, what do you make of this ? :
       
       
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:22 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sacrafice

      And dig out the skeletons of the past, and put them to rest for good ...
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:20 AM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sacrafice

      Apparently there is a great lack in my understanding of this matter.
      I mean, I understand it well, intellectually ... but of what use ? I admit I did not meditate or consciously sought answers with my heart to the extent of aquiring a deeper sense and personal acception of The Mistery of THe Golgotha.
      But you have to forgive me, as lately I have been so busy preventing Lucifer and Ahriman taking over my life, that I could not identify with others' sufferings - be it that of The Christ. I am in a position where I have to spare others on the price of my pain - and I am not at all used to this kind of behavior.
      It seems that the more I struggle to become better, the more it is thrown at me - Steiner said noone should overdo any spiritual exercise, especially not on the expense of his other duties. After dedicating a lot of time and effort to truth seeking, searching, learning, self discipline, I had to realize that the best spiritual practice is living ones own life, in a meaningful manner. (The lucifer being in me just hates this)
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:53 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sacrafice

      Should read:

      > I think I may have used the term 'play' but I want
      > to share that I DO NOT implY(d) this means there was no gravity or
      > suffering to what had occurred.

      Thanks,
      d

      ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
      Be a better friend, newshound, and
      know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile. yahoo.com/ ;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR 8HDtDypao8Wcj9tA cJ




      Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.



      Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
    • Show all 7 messages in this topic