30468Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Credibility
- Feb 2, 2007--- gaelman58 <gaelman58@...> wrote:
> There are any number of intelligent moderate peopleGaelman, you a mon arfter me own heart. Now how about
> who are opposed to
> the current administration. Many of them are in the
> media. They use
> the same sources of information available to the
> rest of us to make
> their case in trying to persuade the American public
> that the Bush
> political/economic agenda is an utter failure.
> These folks are for
> the most part sincere. They are certainly not
> stupid or less informed
> than anyone on this list.
> That latter bit is the primary reason that no major
> media outlet has
> even suggested the possibility of a governmental
> conspiracy regarding
> the events of 9/11. Were the NY Times or NBC
> Nightly News to break
> such a story with the kind of evidence presented
> here, their
> credibility as reliable news sources would
> immediately go into the
> toilet. Their media competitors would gleefully
> have a field day
> poking fun at them. They, not the conspiracy, would
> be the hot news item.
> But there is indeed a place for the "reporting" of
> such conspiracies.
> I'm referring to those tabloids one sees at the end
> of the check-out
> lines at supermarkets. You know....the ones
> reporting Hillary's
> affair with her chauffeur and the woman who gave
> birth to an alligator.
> Funny thing...I've never seen anyone buy one of
> those tabloids...G.
apply some of that logic to papal infallibility!
Frank Thomas Smith
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>