Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

29578Re: Chipping chunks from the Ego

Expand Messages
  • Deborah
    Nov 1, 2006
      Hi Lightsearcher,
      There are some grand canyon size gaps in your reasoning.

      First, where did Steiner characterize Islam as demonic? Does this
      characterization apply to all of Islam or some of Islam or Islam in
      a particular historical period or ?

      Does being inspired by Sorat directly link Islam to chipping away
      parts of the individual ego forever? Seems like a big gap there to
      me.

      The human head and face is an expression of the human ego. However,
      if someone is injured or deformed in the face area, what effect does
      this have on their ego expression?

      What is the difference between Soratian Islam and Islam in general?

      Why does Islam mainly cover women's faces? Are they more malevolent
      than men's faces? Frankly, you are getting weird here.

      Deborah

      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "lightsearcher1"
      <lightsearcher1@...> wrote:
      >
      > 1. Steiner characterized demonic
      > Islam as inspired by Sorat.
      >
      > 2. Sorat chips away parts of
      > the individual Ego forever.
      >
      > 3. The human head and Face is an
      > expression of the human Ego.
      >
      > 4. What is it that Soratian Islam
      > has against the human head and
      > face -- such that they either wish
      > to mask their facial malevolence, or
      > to black it out with a burqua, or to
      > simply machete it off from the
      > torso and forget about it?
      >
      > http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/851/1853/1600/HumanHead-
      > Islam.0.jpg
      >
      > http://tinyurl.com/yfxkpj
      >
    • Show all 7 messages in this topic