29277RE: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Unanthroposophic waldorf schools
- Oct 2, 2006Hahahahahaha - I haven't had such a good laugh in a long time. Thanks
>From: "Deborah" <doybia@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Subject: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Unanthroposophic waldorf schools
>Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:23:40 -0000
>Somebody over on the WC (Diana) published a list of all the stuff
>that is good about waldorf and then finished by saying they would be
>great schools if they just got rid of the anthroposophy.
>I've been thinking for a long time that it would be wonderful if
>some brave folks started a sort of lab school: waldorf without the
>anthroposophy. The obvious group to undertake this much needed
>experiment are the waldorf critics. They are experts at
>distinguishing the essential from the non-essential in waldorf, they
>are hard-working, persistent, dedicated, idealistic AND they say
>they know a lot of parents who would have loved waldorf if it
>weren't for the anthroposophy, so it shouldn't be that hard to find
>20 families to start a school. After a few years as a
>nursery/kindergarten they can start adding grades and after 14 or 15
>years they'll have a full-fledged unanthroposophical "waldorf"
>Of course, their school won't have any social problems. That all
>comes from the anthroposophy. No cliques among the parents either.
>No childhood illnesses because, as a private school, they'll be able
>to refuse vaccine exemptions. And all vaccines work 100% and there
>is no such thing as negative reactions, so all of their students
>will be perfectly healthy.
>It would be fun to see the WC try to actually accomplish something
>in the real world. Of course, there was the lawsuit...but is the
>legal system part of the real world?
Research and compare new cars side by side at carpoint.com.au
- << Previous post in topic