29062Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: Spiritual Science from a slightly different angle.
- Sep 17, 2006Dear Deborah, I don't feel judged by you. I mean maybe
you were judging me but I guess you would know that.
I don't consider my position to be one of judging
Keith. Rather I think of my position as one who has
watched the critics work deeper into the hole by
suggesting that all waldorf teachers are abusers, and
that Diana is afraid of me and others because we might
be capable of torturing others due to our beliefs in
spirit work. Then Keith said a few weeks back that
maybe Steiner was a schizo. I'm seeing a pattern here.
And that is what I am responding to.
I then watch Keith say certain things about Steiner
and usually I'll just make a comment every once in a
while when he shows back up on list for some thing.
And this time he showed back up with a revist to a
post by Mike T. I intuited he brought this for some
reason and I did not think it was in good faith. So,
with that, I thought back on the last thing I heard
him say, about maybe two or three weeks back, that
maybe Steiner was a schizo. So, in my intuiting into a
thing I felt that I wanted to play a little hard ball
with 'I see you'. Something I have said from time to
time. I thought and do think he is playing a game. And
I thought to say something about it.
I find it hellacaiously interesting that the critics
claim over and over that Waldorf and Anthroposophy are
hiding a thing. So, when I'm hearing this and then
seeing how clearly they are all atheists and humanists
and free thinkers, and then Keith saying 'maybe he was
a schizo' I thought well that's enough of double speak
without me saying something.
So I don't judge Keith for saying it, I actually think
its a pretty ignorant thing to say, although that
doesn't mean I think Keith is ignorant. And I really
don't know if he even believes it. He said it and I
thought 'hey, well be accountable to saying it'. 'You
wanna play that double game, good, but now you are
gonna asked to be accountable for it'.
And I think I'm okay with asking him about it. I think
its okay to say 'hey man, what's up with that double
speak you got going on'? What's up with the Steiner is
a schizo thing? What's up with bringing up an old post
that is then used to show that spirit groups can be
wacko. I think he's leading to something and I wanted
him to know I thought that. I think I was pretty clear
in it. I don't think of it as a judgement and I don't
even find any judgement in it, just questions.
All good things to you Deborah,
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>