Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

25472Re: Steiner on Steiner

Expand Messages
  • Steve Hale
    May 2, 2006
      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, dottie zold
      <dottie_z@...> wrote:
      > I'm imagining that the way our teachers nature friend
      > interacted with him as the emmesary, which then led to
      > the Master, is how the CC Church works its services
      > out in a way as well as the readers of First Class.
      > It is said that they work to be devoid of personality
      > so that something can come in and speak in a certain
      > manner when they are in those roles. And it seems that
      > our teacher set it up in this manner according to how
      > it happened for him. I had never heard that he said
      > the other had said a thing without enthusiasm which
      > then created a lot in another.
      > I think when we speak of Master are we talking about
      > Christian Rosenkruez? It would seem we are if the
      > letter M is used as a name.
      > Best,
      > Dottie


      These notes for Schure are important to be given here, now; right as
      we are again experiencing the critical viewpoint of a materialist.
      Now, whether this materialist sides with Kant and believes that
      a 'ding-an-sich' actually exists behind the world of sense
      perception and logical cognition, or is a strict logical empiricist
      like Hume, who greatly influenced Kant, is not the point. Either
      will do quite well for a materialist.

      The point is that these notes to Schure give a very lucid and
      rational description of Rudolf Steiner's own path of development
      from three aspects. (1) is the philosophical or epistemological
      path which I am transcribing now, and contains a very important
      final summation that serves to set the path of anthroposophical
      spiritual science; (2) gives the psychological aspect centered on
      the rosicrucian path; and (3) is the cosmological or evolutionary
      aspect in a certain brief detail.

      So, by September of 1907 Steiner's system has developed to a well-
      integrated trinity of philosophical-psychological-cosmological
      proportions, and thus very cogent for the uptake. My interest in
      presenting this biographical sketch concerns this cogency, as well
      as the fact that it helps to embellish Steiner's autobiography,
      which terminates before the midpoint of that year, 1907. And, of
      course, to demonstrate that spiritual science is a study that people
      strive for because they choose to do so, just as there are those
      that don't. It's a personal thing; something that resides in the
      soul of the aspirant. And some critics don't even believe in a
      soul, or a spirit in man because it's not outwardly visible to their
      critical eye of angular representation.

    • Show all 3 messages in this topic