20805Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: I love a mystery
- Nov 2, 2005"...'A snapper-up of unconsidered trifles' - that is
Autolycus in The Winter's Tale; it is also Shakespeare
and, indeed, any writer of drama or narrative fiction.
The writer needs a scrap of psycho-analytical
terminology: he does not have to read the whole of
Freud; he merely has to filch something from a
paperback glossary or a learned man met on a bus. He
needs to know somethjing about Madagasgar of Cipango,
so he asks a sailor who has been there. You may know
the fiction writer by his library, whose contents
flatter neither the eye nor the owner's capacity for
systematic reading. Instead of phalanges of rich
uniform bindings, there are old racing guides,
dog-eared astrological almanacs, comic periodicals.
second-hand dictionaries, un-scholarly history books,
notebooks full of odd facts, picked up in Lying-in
hospitas or taxidermist's shops. When Shakespeare
achieved a library, if he ever did, we can be sure it
was not like Bacon's..." to be continued.
--- Frank Smith <eltrigal78@...> wrote:
> Dottie, Bacon may have been involved in the Kinghttp://us.click.yahoo.com/rAWabB/gYnLAA/i1hLAA/I3dslB/TM
> version of the Bible, but please forget about the
> Baconian heresy, i.e., that he really wrote
> Shakespeare's plays and poems:
> "It comes down to this: Shakespeare could not make
> himself a supreme man of letters without benefit of
> something better than a free grammar school
> And that he had nothing more than this seems
> There is no record of his going to the university.
> was married in his teens and, besides, where was the
> money to come from? But it is nonsense to suppose
> high art needs high learning. Any peasant can teach
> himself to write, and write well. Any peasant can,
> reading the appropriate books and by keeping his
> senses alert, give the illusion of great knowledge
> the world. The plays of Shakespeare, through the
> trickery of the artist, give the illusion that their
> creator has travelled widely, practiced all the
> learned professions, bent his supple knee in courts
> domestic and foreign. The brilliant surface suggests
> an erudition and an expeerience that need not, in
> fact, be there: the artist does not have to be a
> courtier, teveller or scholar, though it may be his
> task to create such men out of his imagination. The
> Baconians and the rest of the heretics are deluded
> into thinking that a work of art is of the same
> as a work of scholarship: this play shows a
> of the law, therefore the playwright must have
> the law; that play is set in Upper Mongolia,
> the playwright must have travelled thither. There
> no baconians among practising literary artists, and
> there never have been: they no too much about the
> workings of the minds of professional writers..."
> Anthony Burgess: "Shakespeare"
> to be continued.
> --- dottie zold <dottie_z@...> wrote:
> > Okay Frank, here is one of my posts from before.
> > is a link from
> > December of last year. I didn't realize it denotes
> > the date of 1611 as
> > the outing of the King James version. Very
> > interesting numbers as it
> > does correspond with the stream of 1616 as the
> > death: 11 as the twins
> > as well as the John 11:1 for the raising of
> > Whew. anyhow, here
> > it is and it refers to the '46th'.
> > http://www.sirbacon.org/links/bible.html
> > d
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> Click here to rescue a little child from a life of
> Yahoo! Groups Links
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>