Lightsearcher reply to SR
All your opinions are quite acceptable
(at least up until your tag-ending).
It is quite good and PROPER and reasonable
that you ask them about Starman and his
I support the asking, no problem. Hang in there !
> ... did Starman ask you to speak for him?Absolutely not. I've had no contact from him
whatsoever on this...and probably only a total
of five interactions in toto prior to this.
> Or are you the same entity?Paranoia strikes! (see BELOW also)
In answer to this quesion: No one person
could have two such different writing styles !
But more sadly important is your next
> Who are you, exactly?Here, your fundamental tendency
> What do you have to hide?
"L'Inquisitor Grande" your eternal proclivity, clicks in.
Saints be praised, for the non-clairvoyant life of me,
the only past-life experience that ANY human being
could POSSIBLY have had to lead to such a proclivity is this:
In your prior life you were blessed to be a person either of:
And in this anxious lifetime past, you became increasingly
fearful, cautious, and "dread-filled" of other persons who each
became in your eyes a personal threat to the removal
or loss, by force or otherwise in your eyes, of that Wealth
or Power or Fame.
And hence the need to probe, investigate and dig as a
felt-defense against perceived threats to your worldly
possessions in that fearful lifetime.
Hence the proclivity passes on to this incarnation,
reflexively, to dig, unmask and "out" other human beings,
the need to know their "dossier in full."
I already cited in months past your need to probe new people
at parties, not being able to stifle your need that leads you
within a bare 13.5 seconds of meeting them to rudely inquire:
-- "WHAT do YOU do for a LIVING?" --
This is the need to protect, PIGEONHOLE and peg a
person, nay for you ALL people, so that your deepest
hidden fear and anxiety is put at ease.
I respectfully ask:
Do you not have the inner security to meet
fellow human beings on an OPEN basis, enjoying
their fellowship without having to probe their
LIVELIHOODS and OCCUPATIONS and NAMES
and BACKGROUNDS in such a paranoiac manner?
I am not probing here.
I require NO REPLY, for this is not an INQUISITION
such as is your nature to mount.
- --- lightsearcher1 <lightsearcher1@...> wrote:
> > Or are you the same entity?its not paranoia. Its a simple question, to which a simple yes or no would
> Paranoia strikes! (see BELOW also) ?
suffice. Cyberspace allows for possibilities which would be absurd in
normal encounter. We cannot reliably proceed on the assumption that this
is <just like real life>. Nor that our post-9/11 life is just like what
> In answer to this quesion: No one personNot true. Multiple Personality Disorder - of which I believe we have seen
> could have two such different writing styles !
a classical example on this and related lists (no, not Starman!) - allow
such characteristics to manifest
> But more sadly important is your next ?and etc., etc., etc.
> > Who are you, exactly?
> > What do you have to hide?
> Here, your fundamental tendency ?
> "L'Inquisitor Grande" ? your eternal proclivity, clicks in.
...and yours, to sidestep the question. I note that you avoid my
questions to you with escalated counter-accusations. Hence I consider my
questions even more pertinent. Your reluctance to speak from yourself,
about yourself, is revealing.
"The only thing I regret about my past is the length of it. If I had to live my life again I'd make the same mistakes, only sooner." - Tallulah Bankhead
"Criminal: A person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation." - Clarence Darrow
"Those who cannot hear the music think that the dancer is mad." - Rumi
"The victim who is able to articulate the situation of the victim has ceased to be a victim: he or she has become a threat." - James Baldwin
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more