Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Global Ahrimanic Deceptions

Expand Messages
  • Bradford Riley
    Senator Byrd Feb. 2003 many countries around the globe wonder if they will soon be on our -- or some other nation s -- hit list. High level Administration
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 3, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      Senator Byrd Feb. 2003
       
      "many countries around
      the globe wonder if they will soon be on our -- or
      some other nation's -- hit list. High level
      Administration figures recently refused to take
      nuclear weapons off of the table when discussing a
      possible attack against Iraq. What could be more
      destabilizing and unwise than this type of
      uncertainty, particularly in a world where globalism
      has tied the vital economic and security interests
      of many nations so closely together? There are huge
      cracks emerging in our time-honored alliances, and
      U.S. intentions are suddenly subject to damaging
      worldwide speculation. Anti-Americanism based on
      mistrust, misinformation, suspicion, and alarming
      rhetoric from U.S. leaders is fracturing the once
      solid alliance against global terrorism which
      existed after September 11. "
       
      Bradford comments;
       
      For those on this list who do not understand the word ZEITGEIST, it means
      TIME SPIRIT - it means current politics is fighting with an Ahrimanic
      Insertion of Zeitgeist Archai status as an Ahrimanic deception in current
      American Politics of George Bush - against the Michael Time Spirit -
      ZeitGeist status. The Michael Zeitgeist places The Christ Being as the
      Center of Gravity for Earth evolution. This Christ Being has nothing to do
      with the Fundamentalism of George Bush which is the tyrant of the will of
      Christ. Christian conservative fundamentalism makes Christ into a tyrant of
      Freedom, which America is becoming for the world.
       
      All along the WATCHTOWER, we have kept our Eyes and Ears geared to grasping a Time Spirit moment. Much that has transpired has surprised me. The TimeSpirit the ZeitGeist under the Michael Rulership has seeded culture with enough substance that the current Bush Adminstration can be seen through. That makes the battle lines and the vision lines a little less daunting. The fact that others have contributed, seen through, and brought their own Intellectual Soul - Free Spiritual Insights - To counter act Media propaganda. This is new and something to celebrate.
       
      "The All-Seeing-Eye in IAO's logo is watching, listening, and tracking the
      whole globe. Judging by their stated areas of research, I think the plan is
      to marry 'psychic spying' with Echelon technology - thus the use of a
      recognized occult symbol for a logo. How's that for your tax dollars at
      work?"
       

      Michael Research from Soren:
       
      "Some US officials were in Iraq in the mid-eighties to make a deal
      with Saddam. They said nothing, when he later used all kinds of
      prohibited weapons against Iran .. they closed their eyes when he used
      the stuff against his own people...
      The person from the US-government who made the deals was - RUMSFELD
       
      In fact a lot of political figures profiling themselves now, have a
      past of buddying up with Saddam - They play poker, and we pay the price
      Now Saddam is a cheater in poker - he seemed to fool them all, and what we see now is VERY personal ---
       
      In the late 70'ties when Saddam was vice-president, but the real
      leading figure behind events, Saddam decided that the arab-world should also have the bomb (Israel had/have it, though they're not allowed to either according to international agreements) - at that time Iraq had strategic ties to Soviet, but they didn't trust him, and refused to sell an atomic reactor sophisticted enough for enrichening uranium .... so Saddam turned to the french government, and though they knew what he was up to, he waved money enough to make them look the other way.. The French prime-minister went to Iraq and signed a big deal - Iraq got their reactor (well and Israel flew over and smashed it at once) - name of the french primeminister then: CHIRAC!!!
       
      German companies, with consent from their government made great deals
      selling pesticide factories, well aware that it was for production of nerve-gas (at least the present German government wasn't involved )
       
      American companies sold technology for biological warfare ...
       
      Saddam was a popular guy, there were great profits to make dealing with him, and they all stood in line to get their hands in the big fat war machine cookie jar.
       
      Every one of these western "liberators" were corrupted by Saddam, (or already corrupt enough to at all consider doing buisness with him) and they kept their mouths shut when he violated every right against his own people, and using illegal warfare against Iran ...
       
      Well then Saddam thought he had a good hand and played the Kuwait card ... And why the hell was he then allowed to stay in power - ???
      Then Rumsfeld and the bunch now in charge also talked about "liberating" Iraq, encouraged the Iraqi people to make a rebellion, and they did - and they were betrayed and left on
      their own, "rewarded" with the sanctions - see good guys
      we're supposed to entrust this operation, they figured out
      that it was strategically better to have a Saddam in short leash at
      power, than getting what the Iraqi's could come up with - moderate
      Shiite's (the majority of Iraqi's are Shiite's (the same kind of islam
      as in Iran, though the main sect in Iraq doesn't believe in political
      Islam in the Iranian version), kurds and commie's ----
       
      To get Shiite's in power isn't wanted by the western allies in the
      Arab world (the absolute monarchies - Saudi, Oman, Bahrein, Kuwait, the places that really are middle age Islamic, and the western War mongering liars keep totally silent about - How many talk about liberating Saudi's from their despotic king ?? - of course not .. he's a good asslicker) The turkish military doen't want a stong Kurdish autonomy in Iraq. It'll give them trouble with their own kurdish population ... Well and nobody like commie's :-)
       
      So now Chirac, Bush, Rumsfeld and Saddam (The Usual Suspects) are playing a new hand - as they have been doing for 20 years .. and honestly I think they care nothing about people --- They are sick minds - sociopaths - and as long as we trust people like that and allow them to be in charge of the world ... we have to pay billions in taxe's paying for something we never asked for anyhow.
       
      Let the companies that earned billions trading with Saddam pay for
      this war !!!!!!!!!
       
      Who was on the board of ABB when they sold atomicpower equipment to
      North Korea a couple of years ago - RUMSFELD (guess he got a good fee for being on that board). Now people are getting payback for owning ABB (and other stocks) shall get a tax-relief .. so there's a full profit on selling the conflicts that they have created out of their own self interest. Who is now getting paid for dealing with getting rid of shit he first earned money selling? - RUMSFELD
       
      Who is paying the price - you and I, the decent people in Iraq, North Korea, France, Germany, USA --- wherever
       
      Deport these sociopathic pokerplayers - Chirac, Saddam, Kim Jong Il,
      Rumsfeld, Bush and their buddies in the military industry - to another
      planet with a deck of cards. So we can live the REAL life." (comments by Soren)
       
      Notes from Mr. Chomsky;
       
       
      "President Bush’s principal adviser in these matters appears to be Donald
      Rumsfeld (net worth: $120 million and rising) who was described by Henry
      Kissinger, no piker himself in this department, as one of the most ruthless
      men he had ever known! The vice-President, just turned 61, (net worth: $110
      million, but falling), and the resident energy Czar, is a very sick man; but
      one assumes that his blessing for the new imperialism have been given. One
      would expect the Second Lady, a leader in Christian and Conservative causes,
      to join the First Lady and Mr. Justice Kennedy of the Supreme Court in the outreach to teen-agers who they, discovered, are insufficiently outraged by
      the disaster of 9-11. Translation: one needs to prepare the young to accept
      and internalize the new Imperialism! For, this new Imperialism is not
      exclusively about Foreign Affairs: it is also about a New Conservative
      America that would embody the fascism of most American Presidents, and of
      outsiders like Mr. Newton Gingrich our beloved ex-Speaker, who last
      attempted to abolish the Public Broadcasting System and the great American
      Universities and Museums, to the cheers of Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, the
      zealous Christian and Jewish Orthodox; and Main Street America, generally.
      This policy has a practical outcome: lower taxation, less spending on public
      matters (except of course Defense and the military-industrial complex), and
      the virtual abandonment of the US Constitution.
       
      "The ‘benefits’ to the 1% who own 40% of America are perhaps even more
      important than Central Asian oil, the establishment of a herd of red cows,
      and a new Jewish temple, on the holy mountain, the conversion of remaining
      ‘heathen’ of this world, and so on! We have heard President Bush and the
      Media, ‘scaring’ the American people into accepting this plan. But, apart
      from this absurd rhetoric, they calculate, rightly, that the American people
      even those outside the ranks of the ‘booboisie’, but with their Pension
      Plans invested in American Companies that are to benefit by this plan, will
      understand the advantages of it and, like the Roman businessmen of the time,
      go along with Caesar!
       
      "For a decade, or two, progressives around the world had seen the
      international market place as a great liberating force that would bring
      about an End to All History, in the words of Frank Fukuyama. Many young men
      and women, around the world, but mainly of the upper and middle-classes in
      the developed countries, disagreed: and we saw the rioting in Switzerland,
      and at Seattle, Quebec and Genoa that led to the Leaders of the developed
      countries, the masters of the Free World, the harbingers of World Democracy
      running for dear life! It was beyond the wildest dreams of Dan Cohen-Bendit
      and the new Syndicalists of France. The next meeting was to be held in
      Washington D.C. but it was moved to Banff, Canada, where 5-star hotel
      accommodation is available in a region so remote that uninvited guests
      wouldn’t be able to travel there. But now with the anti-terror rhetoric
      firmly established, the powers have decided to hold it in New York City
      starting with a Prayer breakfast at the WTC site, the Temple Mount of the
      New Age.
       
      "Mr. Michael Bloomberg, the new Mayor who bought his post at a high price,
      has revived a 250 year old law that bans the wearing of masks, so that
      cameras could record the identity of the rioters for future stigmatization
      as ‘terrorists’; to be denied air-travel, jobs, mortgages and credit-cards.
      Fascism, when allied to the new technology can out do Stalin, Hitler and
      Franco; and outthink Arthur Koestler and George Orwell.
       
      "Such in broad outline, is the plan, the perpetual ‘stock’ dream of
      Americans since Cotton Mather. It will fail, internationally, for the same
      reason that the Reagan-Gingrich plan failed nationally; a reason that the
      fatheads can never understand: it is contrary to the ZEITGEIST! But the
      subject of these ruminations is not the idiocy of the traditional American
      leadership: it is the idiocy of Mr. Ariel Sharon and his followers in Israel
      and elsewhere who believe in their title to the land between the Nile and
      the Euphrates, that 'God' gave them. This latter though, must be seen as a
      part of the larger picture, for an important reason.
       
      "Zionism was a precursor of this New Imperialism; it furnished the
      unsinkable aircraft carrier of an age that had yet to invent the
      transcontinental guided missile, the smart target-smelling cruise missiles;
      and now the full-size pilotless fighters and bombers that the
      military-industrial complex is all excited about. One should dust off and
      re-read Gulliver’s Journey to Laputa for a fuller description of a ruling
      class, living on a mountain floating in the atmosphere, that would suddenly
      descend and crush any of the helots on earth dreaming of Independence! The
      new American ruling class are to be the new Laputans, Dean Swift’s prophecy
      fulfilled to the last letter. In that world, the Laputans had no need to pay
      out good money to terrestrial partisans, for the good reason that they could
      do their ‘policing’ without local assistance. Why should the New America pay
      out good money to the head-bobbing idle, fundamentalists of Israel when the
      Arab and the Muslim world are led by willing accomplices able to coerce
      their own ‘Islamic’ radicals; or can be brought to heel, by America’s wealth
      and weapons! It is to be expected that the first Jewish defectors from
      Zionism will be the wealthy Jews of the Bloomberg variety, who will readily
      appreciate the cost-effectiveness of President Bush’s solution. The
      leadership of Israel have gotten the message: there is today an
      unprecedented sense of unity aboard their pirate-ship: all hands know that
      their existence is at stake. They have seen their true enemy; and they find
      that it is America, with Europe playing a valuable auxiliary role.
       
      "Mr. Sharon, for this reason is fighting every effort to bring him to the
      negotiating table. He knows than any negotiation will mean a retreat to
      1967. Procrastination, by fair means or foul is has last weapon. He began
      with an argument that that he would sit down with the Palestinians unless
      they observed a week of dead silence: and to make certain that they wouldn’t
      be quiet, he has conducted a brazen policy of targeted assassinations. These
      extra-judicial murders do not make Sharon, at least in the eyes of President
      Bush, a ‘terrorist’ of the same stamp as Bin Laden. The killing of Israeli
      non-combatants is a crime of the most vicious stamp; but the corresponding
      killing of innocent Palestinians is only unavoidable collateral damage. Our
      American Media fully supports this double standard, but the foreigners,
      Europeans and Canadians see no need to pull their punches. News World
      International, from Canada, remains American’s only access to truthful TV
      coverage."
       
      Sunday February 23, 2003
      The Observer
       
      >Two men driving Bush into war
       
      Ed Vulliamy in New York profiles the religious figures behind a
      'Texanised presidency' who believe war will mean America is respected
      in the Islamic world
       
      Behind President George W. Bush's charge to war against Iraq, there is
      a carefully devised mission, drawn up by people who work over the
      shoulders of those whom America calls 'The Principals'.
       
      Lurking in the background behind Bush, his Vice- President, Dick
      Cheney, and Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld are the people
      propelling US policy. And behind them, the masterminds of the Bush
      presidency as it arrived at the White House from Texas, are Karl Rove
      and Paul Wolfowitz.
       
      It is too simple to explain the upcoming war as 'blood for oil', as
      did millions of placards last weekend, for Rove and Wolfowitz are
      ideologists beyond the imperatives of profit. They represent an
      unlikely and formidable alliance forged between the gritty Texan
      Republicans who took over America, fuelled by fierce conservative
      Christianity, and a faction of the East Coast intelligentsia with
      roots in Ronald Reagan's time, devoted to achieving raw, unilateral
      power.
       
      Rove and Wolfowitz have worked for decades to reach their moment, and
      that moment has come as war draws near. Bush calls Rove, depending on
      his mood, 'Boy Genius' or 'Turd Blossom'. Rove is one of a new
      political breed - the master craftsmen - nurturing a 24-year political
      campaign of his own design, but careful not to expose who he really
      is.
       
      His Christian faith is a weapon of devastating cogency, but he never
      discusses it; no one knows if his politics are religious or politics
      are his religion. A Christmas Day child born in Denver, as a boy he
      had a poster above his bed reading 'Wake Up, America!' As a student,
      he was a fervent young Republican who pitched himself against the
      peace movement.
       
      His first bonding with Bush was not over politics, but the two men's
      ideological and moral distaste for the Sixties - after Bush's
      born-again conversion from alcoholism to Christianity. Rove was
      courted by George Bush Snr during his unsuccessful bid to be the
      Republican presidential candidate for 1980.
       
      But Rove's genius would show later, on Bush senior's election to the
      White House in 1988, when he co-opted the right-wing Christian
      Coalition - wary of Bush's lack of theocratic stridency - into the
      family camp.
       
      Conservative Southern Protestantism was a constituency Bush Jr
      befriended and kept all the way to Washington, defining both his own
      political personality and the new-look Republican Party.
       
      When Rove answered the call to come to Texas in 1978, every state
      office was held by a Democrat. Now, almost all of them are Republican.
      Every Republican campaign was run by Rove and in 1994 his client -
      challenging for the state governorship - was a man he knew well:
      George W. Bush.
       
      'Rove and Bush came to an important strategic conclusion,' writes Lou
      Dubose, Rove's biographer. 'To govern on behalf of the corporate
      Right, they would have to appease the Christian Right.'
       
      Bush's six years as Texas governor were a dry run for national
      domestic policy - steered by Rove - as President: lavish favours to
      the energy industry, tax breaks for the upper income brackets and
      social policy driven by evangelical zeal.
       
      Bush had been governor for only a year when, as Rove says, it 'dawned
      on me' he should run for President; two years later, in 1997, he began
      secretly planning the campaign. In March 1999, Bush ordered Rove to
      sell his consulting firm - 'he wanted 120 per cent of his attention,'
      says a former employee, 'full-time, day and night'.
       
      Rove hatched and ran the presidential campaign, deploying the Bush
      family Rolodex and the might of the oil industry and unleashing the
      most vigorous direct-mailing blizzard of all time. 'If the devil is in
      the details,' writes Dubose, 'he had found Rove waiting to greet him
      when he got there.'
       
      By the time George W. became President, Rove was the hub of a Texan
      wheel connecting the family, the party, the Christian Right and the
      energy industry. A single episode serves as metaphor: during the Enron
      scandal last year, a shadow was cast over Rove when it was revealed
      that he had sold $100,000 of Enron stock just before the firm went
      bankrupt.
       
      More intriguing, however, was the fact that Rove had personally
      arranged for the former leader of the Christian Coalition, Ralph Reed,
      to take up a consultancy at Enron - Bush's biggest single financial
      backer - worth between $10,000 and $20,000 a month.
       
      This was the machine of perpetual motion that Rove built. His
      accomplishment was the 'Texanisation' of the national Republican Party
      under the leadership of the Bush family and to take that party back to
      presidential office after eight years. Rove is unquestionably the most
      powerful policy adviser in the White House.
       
      Militant Islam was another world from Rove's. However, on 11
      September, 2001, it became a new piece of political raw material
      needing urgent attention. Rove and Bush had been isolationists,
      wanting as little to do with the Middle East - or any other corner of
      the planet - as possible. But suddenly there was a new arena in which
      to work for political results: and, as Rove entered it, he met and was
      greeted by a group of people who had for years been as busy as he in
      crafting their political model; this time, the export of unchallenged
      American power across the world.
       
      Rove in theory has no role in foreign policy, but Washington insiders
      agree he is now as preoccupied with global affairs as he is with those
      at home. In a recent book, conservative staff speech writer David Frum
      recalls the approach of the presidency towards Islam after the attacks
      and criticises Bush as being 'soft on Islam' for his emphasis on a
      'religion of peace'.
       
      Rove, writes Frum, was 'drawn to a very different answer'. Islam, Rove
      argued, 'was one of the world's great empires' which had 'never
      reconciled... to the loss of power and dominion'. In response, he
      said, 'the United States should recognise that, although it cannot
      expect to be loved, it can enforce respect'.
       
      Rove's position dovetailed with the beliefs of Paul Wolfowitz, and the
      axis between conservative Southern Protestantism and fervent, highly
      intellectual, East Coast Zionism was forged - each as zealous about
      their religion as the other.
       
      There is a shorthand view of Wolfowitz as a firebrand hawk, but he is
      more like Rove than that - patient, calculating, logical, soft-spoken
      and deliberate. Wolfowitz was a Jewish son of academe, a brilliant
      scholar of mathematics and a diplomat. When he joined the Pentagon
      after the Yom Kippur war, he set about laying out what is now US
      policy in the Middle East.
       
      In 1992, just before Bush's father was defeated by Bill Clinton,
      Wolfowitz wrote a blueprint to 'set the nation's direction for the
      next century', which is now the foreign policy of George W. Bush.
      Entitled 'Defence Planning Guidance', it put an onus on the Pentagon
      to 'establish and protect a new order' under unchallenged American
      authority.
       
      The US, it said, must be sure of 'deterring potential competitors from
      even aspiring to a larger regional or global role' - including Germany
      and Japan. It contemplated the use of nuclear, biological and chemical
      weaponry pre-emptively, 'even in conflicts that do not directly engage
      US interests'.
       
      Wolfowitz's group formalised itself into a group called Project for
      the New American Century, which included Cheney and another old
      friend, former Pentagon Under-Secretary for Policy under Reagan,
      Richard Perle.
       
      In a document two years ago, the Project pondered that what was needed
      to assure US global power was 'some catastrophic and catalysing event,
      like a new Pearl Harbor'. The document had noted that 'while the
      unresolved conflict with Iraq provides immediate justification' for
      intervention, 'the need for a substantial American force presence in
      the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein'.
       
      At a graduation speech to the Military Academy at West Point, Bush
      last June affirmed the Wolfowitz doctrine as official policy. 'America
      has, and intends to keep,' he said, 'military strengths beyond
      challenge.'
       
      At the Pentagon, Wolfowitz and his boss Rumsfeld set up an
      intelligence group under Abram Schulsky and the Under-Secretary for
      Defence, Douglas Feith, both old friends of Wolfowitz. The group's
      public face is the semi-official Defence Policy Board, headed by
      Perle. Perle and Feith wrote a paper in 1996 called 'A Clean Break'
      for the then leader of Israel's Likud bloc, Binyamin Netanyahu; the
      clean break was from the Oslo peace process. Israel's 'claim to the
      land (including the West Bank) is legitimate and noble,' said the
      paper. 'Only the unconditional acceptance by Arabs of our rights is a
      solid basis for the future.' At the State Department, the 'Arabist'
      faction of regional experts favouring the diplomacy of alliances in
      the area was drowned out by the hawks, markedly by another new unit
      with favoured access to the White House.
       
      And in Rove's White House, with his backing, the circle was closed and
      the last piece of the jigsaw was put in place, with the appointment of
      Elliot Abrams to handle policy for the Middle East, for the National
      Security Council.
       
      Abrams is another veteran of Reagan days and the 'dirty wars' in
      Central America, convicted by Congress for lying alongside Colonel
      Oliver North over the Iran-Contra scandal, but pardoned by President
      Bush's father.
       
      He has since written a book warning that American Jewry faces
      extinction through intermarriage and has counselled against the peace
      process and for the righteousness of Ariel Sharon's Israel. He is
      Wolfowitz's man, talking every day to his office neighbour, Rove.
       
      by US Senator Robert Byrd
      Senate Floor Speech - Wednesday, February 12, 2003
       
      ......."This Administration, now in power for a little over
      two years, must be judged on its record. I believe
      that that record is dismal.
       
      In that scant two years, this Administration has
      squandered a large projected surplus of some $5.6
      trillion over the next decade and taken us to
      projected deficits as far as the eye can see. This
      Administration's domestic policy has put many of our
      states in dire financial condition, under funding
      scores of essential programs for our people. This
      Administration has fostered policies which have
      slowed economic growth. This Administration has
      ignored urgent matters such as the crisis in health
      care for our elderly. This Administration has been
      slow to provide adequate funding for homeland
      security. This Administration has been reluctant to
      better protect our long and porous borders.
       
      In foreign policy, this Administration has failed to
      find Osama bin Laden. In fact, just yesterday we
      heard from him again marshaling his forces and
      urging them to kill. This Administration has split
      traditional alliances, possibly crippling, for all
      time, International order-keeping entities like the
      United Nations and NATO. This Administration has
      called into question the traditional worldwide
      perception of the United States as well-intentioned,
      peacekeeper. This Administration has turned the
      patient art of diplomacy into threats, labeling, and
      name calling of the sort that reflects quite poorly
      on the intelligence and sensitivity of our leaders,
      and which will have consequences for years to come.
       
      Calling heads of state pygmies, labeling whole
      countries as evil, denigrating powerful European
      allies as irrelevant -- these types of crude
      insensitivities can do our great nation no good. We
      may have massive military might, but we cannot fight
      a global war on terrorism alone. We need the
      cooperation and friendship of our time-honored
      allies as well as the newer found friends whom we
      can attract with our wealth. Our awesome military
      machine will do us little good if we suffer another
      devastating attack on our homeland which severely
      damages our economy. Our military manpower is
      already stretched thin and we will need the
      augmenting support of those nations who can supply
      troop strength, not just sign letters cheering us
      on.
       
      The war in Afghanistan has cost us $37 billion so
      far, yet there is evidence that terrorism may
      already be starting to regain its hold in that
      region. We have not found bin Laden, and unless we
      secure the peace in Afghanistan, the dark dens of
      terrorism may yet again flourish in that remote and
      devastated land.
       
      Pakistan as well is at risk of destabilizing forces.
      This Administration has not finished the first war
      against terrorism and yet it is eager to embark on
      another conflict with perils much greater than those
      in Afghanistan. Is our attention span that short?
      Have we not learned that after winning the war one
      must always secure the peace?
       
      And yet we hear little about the aftermath of war in
      Iraq. In the absence of plans, speculation abroad is
      rife. Will we seize Iraq's oil fields, becoming an
      occupying power which controls the price and supply
      of that nation's oil for the foreseeable future? To
      whom do we propose to hand the reigns of power after
      Saddam Hussein?
       
      Will our war inflame the Muslim world resulting in
      devastating attacks on Israel? Will Israel retaliate
      with its own nuclear arsenal? Will the Jordanian and
      Saudi Arabian governments be toppled by radicals,
      bolstered by Iran which has much closer ties to
      terrorism than Iraq?
       
      Could a disruption of the world's oil supply lead to
      a world-wide recession? Has our senselessly
      bellicose language and our callous disregard of the
      interests and opinions of other nations increased
      the global race to join the nuclear club and made
      proliferation an even more lucrative practice for
      nations which need the income?
       
      In only the space of two short years this reckless
      and arrogant Administration has initiated policies
      which may reap disastrous consequences for years.
       
      One can understand the anger and shock of any
      President after the savage attacks of September 11.
      One can appreciate the frustration of having only a
      shadow to chase and an amorphous, fleeting enemy on
      which it is nearly impossible to exact retribution.
       
      But to turn one's frustration and anger into the
      kind of extremely destabilizing and dangerous
      foreign policy debacle that the world is currently
      witnessing is inexcusable from any Administration
      charged with the awesome power and responsibility of
      guiding the destiny of the greatest superpower on
      the planet. Frankly many of the pronouncements made
      by this Administration are outrageous. There is no
      other word..."
       
      Bradford comments:
       
      Even if we talk about Col.
      House and his handling of the double of Woodrow Wilson we still must
      arrive at the handler for Bush and company because it ain't George,
      just like it wasn't Woodrow. But why be stunned and amazed at the
      tools of Spiritual Science when you can covet your Intellectual Soul
      one trick political pony and expect no rebuke from thinking
      manipulative thoughts without the heart.
       
       
      "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial
      element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the
      days of Andrew Jackson."
       
      "A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933
       
      The mysterious Col. House was a very close advisor to Woodrow Wilson
      when Wilson, admittedly, fell for the scam of the Federal Reserve
      System. Colonel House also wrote the, frankly, Macheavellian "Philip
      Dru: Administrator." This book was very influential among certain
      circles and describes, much like "The Prince," and even the ongoing
      conspiracy source, the circulating "Protcols of the Elders of Zion,
      (whatever their origin)" an interlocked secret society networking
      control of the world. All three are very close in promoting a "we
      know better but the masses can't handle the truth" system of amoral
      exploitation by whatever means were at hand to gain control over any
      power structure. It was a blueprint for making humankind willful
      conspirators in their own exploitation, and, even, destruction. "
       
      Bush and his Double-
       
       
      "In many respects, however, the apprentice Rove has far exceeded the
      chicanery and evil-mindedness of his mentor Segretti. Rove is a tech-
      savvy puppet master for Bush."
       
      ""If you're not with me, you're against me." Bush's binary view
      of "good and evil" and "friend and enemy" sits well with the Rove
      strategy. Georgia's conservative but libertarian-minded
      Representative Bob Barr found out about this in last August's primary
      when his GOP primary opponent John Linder began spreading around
      stories that Barr was "soft on terrorism." Because Barr was skeptical
      about a number of aspects of the Bush-Ashcroft USA PATRIOT Act, he
      became a target for the Rove machine. However, it was likely that
      Barr became a target earlier on when he supported Steve Forbes
      against Bush in the 2000 primary. Bush apparently means to say, "If
      you've not always been with me, you're against me." It must have
      really been a dilemma for Bush and Rove to have to come to the
      support of John Sununu, Jr. in the New Hampshire Senate race.
      Although Daddy made George W. unceremoniously give the axe to
      Sununu's father as White House Chief of Staff during the Bush 41
      administration, the man who the junior Sununu defeated in the
      primary, Bob Smith, was even more of a problem. He had the temerity
      to quit the Republican Party in 2000 and run against Dubya for
      President. So in Bushspeak, which is obviously borrowed from Forrest
      Gump's scripts, "if you're less with me than the other guy, you're
      more against me."
       
      Undoubtedly, Rove was also behind the campaign to "get" Georgia
      Representative Cynthia McKinney who was the first nationally-known
      politician to question what Bush may have known beforehand about 9-
      11. She was defeated by a former Republican state judge who had
      supported the wacky Alan Keyes for President in 2000. Never mind,
      McKinney was "less with Bush" than Keyes, so it was more important to
      get McKinney who was "more against" Bush.
       
      In all seriousness, rewarding the GOP on November 5 will only
      increase the appetite of Rove to amass more and more power into the
      White House. The advent of a Democratic-controlled Senate and House
      might even begin to spell the end of the road for Segretti's star
      pupil. German opposition figures in the mid-1930s often lamented the
      fact that they could have stopped the rise of the Nazis if only they
      had been more united in a common front when they had a chance.
      However, they fell prey to the media manipulation of Goebbels and
      fought among themselves more than they did against the menace from
      the far right. We Americans also have an early opportunity to stem an
      out-of-control and anti-constitutional regime with the Rasputin-like
      Rove at the after steerage helm of our ship of state. That
      opportunity presents itself next Tuesday--Election Day. "
       
      Iraq and the Economy
      U.S. Representative Dennis J. Kucinich
      Swearing-In Ceremony
      Sunday, January 5, 2003
      Cleveland, Ohio
       
      "There is a role for America in the world. It is in working with the
      community of nations to achieve the security of all nations. It is in
      restoring the promise of the Non Proliferation Treaty to lead the way to get
      rid of all nuclear weapons. It is in helping to assure international order.
      It is through strengthening and abiding by international treaties. It is in
      assuring control and eventual elimination of biological and chemical
      weapons, and landmines. It is in protecting our global climate by
      cooperating with the rest of the world in reducing carbon emissions.
       
      America can help protect the world. America can help save the world. But
      America cannot control the world, nor should we want to do so.
       
      Yet our Administration would project American power for the purpose of
      domination. Their National Security doctrines call for America to strike
      anywhere it pleases and to be the first to use nuclear weapons.
       
      Our nation is now poised to go to all-out war against Iraq. Iraq has not
      committed any act of aggression against the United States. Iraq was not
      responsible for 911. No credible evidence exists linking Iraq to Al Queda's
      role in 911. Iraq was not responsible for the anthrax attack on our nation.
      The United Nations has yet to establish that Iraq has usable weapons of mass
      destruction. There is no intelligence that Iraq has the ability to strike at
      the United States. According to the CIA, Iraq has no intention to attack
      America, but will defend itself if attacked.
       
      Why then, is our nation prepared to send three hundred thousand of our young
      men and women into house to house combat in the streets of Baghdad and
      Basra? Why is our nation prepared to spend $200 billion or more of our
      hard-earned tax dollars for the destruction of Iraq?
       
      Why is our nation preparing to use the most powerful military machine in
      history to wage an assault against the people of Iraq, to destroy their
      houses and buildings, to wipe out their water and electric systems and to
      block their access to food and medical supplies?
       
      There is no answer which can separate itself from oil economics, profit
      requirements of arms trade, or distorted notions of empire-building.
       
      War with Iraq is wrong. But if war is prosecuted further in Iraq, we must be
      prepared to advance the cause of peace in this country. We must be prepared
      to stand up, to speak out, to organize, to march, to demand an end to the
      war, or to demand an end to an administration which insists on war..."
       
       
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.