Re: R: R: [anthroposophy] Michaelic thinking and "american" needs
- Dear Andrea:
--- VALENTINA BRUNETTI <okcgbr@...> wrote:
> Submission? An objective truth may be only an experience , but not aGood; I just wanted to make sure that we were not in disagrement on this
> "fixed" one. It's a process and a path, a dynamic one and it compels
> nothing and none.
> Bad for you !! (smile).You mean this one:
> PSSTT: (Reread where I talk about the difference between "first step"
> "second step" in concentration: THE CORE IS THERE , but don'let THEM
> Well, the point is : where this inner life begins to different from mineand where it begins to get nearer to me, as you seem to say, tipical
"Central European" gesture (but to be totally true I'm not a "central"
but a "southern-mediterranean-central"....)?
It seems to me that if I practice a concentration exercise there may be
differences in the "building of the house" (First step) but when I succeed
in contemplating the "result", aka the "trace of the light" of the "willed
synthesis" (second step) the distance is nearly zero since we're in the
etheric realm where is no boundary.....
I would not go so far as to say that: I think there are many boundarties
in the etheric. According to my way of viewing it, the etheric is far
closer to the physical that it is to the pure spirit. Our etheric bodies
are heavily associated with our place of birth (as is the basis for
astrological horosocpes) and our deepest personality patterns - probably
the same thing - our physiology, and our anscestral lineage and genetic
types, etc. And our thinking patterns.
See, as a European, you assume that all triangles are formed upon a flat
planar surface. On such a surface, their anges do add up to 180 degrees.
But someone from another culture with a different etheric mode of
cognition might well assume that triangles are drawn upon a sphere - which
corresponds much more closely to the reality of living upon planet earth -
and this person would correctly observe - and Imagine! - that the angles
are always more than 180 degrees. There would be no fault in this persons
thinking if he/she did not agree with _your_ ideation of the properties of
Thus I see aour thinking as very much <not necessarily free>, although its
a hell of a lot freer than just about anything else which we can access
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that
we are powerful beyond measure." Nelson Mandela, quoting Marianne Williamson, inaugural speech, 1994.
"Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books that are written in a very foreign tongue . . . and the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps you will gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer." Rilke
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.