Re: Antichton : Counter Earth
Steve: "Have you ever considered why Aquinas was made a saint for redeeming Aristotle? Why would a catholic monk be made a saint for redeeming the philosophy of a philosopher? Big question, with big answer. But do you have the acumen to ask it?"
Do I have the acumen to ask it? Do you think that I embrace the path of Catholism over and above that which flows on the spirit side of our collective soul fabric?
I try not to stick to rigid forms of thought (that would 'rape' me of freedom). And, it seems that pre Aristotle thought forms have always risked seeping into philosophical/spiritual reflections even when the establishment 'forbade' it.
After all, each individual sleeps at night, this has occured throughout the greater part of human history. Therefore, regardless of what would be continually 'hammered out' in outward society, the Spirit Realm has always maintained it's means of influencing, breaking down overly rigid forms. Perhaps it was because individuals 'sleep' that Mystery Schools where able to be consistently inspired throughout the 4th cultural Epoch.
In our day, with the 'lies' towards Islam occupying outward social thought, it would be because these people 'sleep' that they are still able to start everyday 'afresh', in spirit light and not be subject, within their beings, to the weight derived from conceptions which deface them of human significance.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Stephen Hale" <sardisian01@...> wrote:
> --- In email@example.com, "carol" organicethics@
> > Alright Steve, would it be possible to be a little more concrete
> on 2
> > points?
> > Could you describe <what normally should have occured> with the
> moon on
> > the 10/11 of July. It seems that you have described what <actually>
> > occured, though please feel free to reiterate.
> I took the liberty of giving a description of the moon phases in
> deference to Robert's post, but let me say this: the 10/11 of July
> is occurring right now in February, so note it, even if it's cloudy.
> > Also, exactly what <aspect> of arabism are you refering to when you
> > apply the term in the following:
> > "clear evidence of an underlying and motivating power of
> the "arabism"
> > seen as arising out of 666 as the original date in which Soradt
> > arose on the surface of the earth to begin its destructive reign."
> > Could you possibly be referring to a distinct soul configuration-
> > could come about if ONLY the great facility at 'apprehending
> > reality' is summoned in combination with a powerful
> instinctual 'Will
> > force'?
> > These 2 'components' let's say, in no way completely cover
> the 'arab' of
> > the past nor of the present. In spiritual science, we must keep in
> > that unimaginable mulitiplicit spiritual variables are in constant
> > interplay.
> Arabism is a complicated subject, which must be gleaned from the
> modern idea of 'oil for profit' in order to *subject* the big white
> beast into submission. Rather, it can rightfully be said that the
> modern middle east is as progressive as Vietnam was back in the
> 1950's, when Ngo Diehm took charge of the Republic of Vietnam.
> So, what we have to differentiate is the form of arabism living
> today in the world of people, and *that* old form that rose out of
> when Aristole's secret teachings found their way to Arabia back when
> Plato's Academy was closed. That's where it began. And that is why
> a famous fresco exists of Thomas Aquinas with Averroes under his
> Have you ever considered why Aquinas was made a saint for redeeming
> Aristotle? Why would a catholic monk be made a saint for redeeming
> the philosophy of a philosopher? Big question, with big answer.
> But do you have the acumen to ask it?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "carol" <organicethics@...> wrote:
> Ok, sorry Bruce, I evidently wasn't aware of what you described.
> Perhaps Karen now faces a necessary life lesson of refining her use of
> 'tact'. When I consider this from an Anthroposophic perspective, I see
> it as becoming able to spread oneself out over larger 'soul terrain' by
> engaging a more controlled Will force which takes into itself highly
> creative soul forces.
> Again, consciousness soul stuff, what can I say. I guess it really is
> tough stuff in the end...
> Good day, carol.
Carol, this is Karen's final communication to me, and I find it perplexing. It seems to have more to do with Bruce than me, but Karen was always confusing us. Here it is:So my dear, unable at any time to deal with the unpleasant karma
between us because of course Bruce has been manipulating my post for
the past year, and deliberatly placing things out of context and we've
never been able to honestly deal with the karmic situation. I suppose
at least bruce is posting from his archives now instead of everthing
he was holing up and holding back so that he could write up on it in
spiritualscience. Not to worry i dont.
I dont like having bad feeling s towards people and for the most part
I certainly don't.
So from my part I wish you bliss, love, happiness and joy but I guess
its not what you want.. whatever it is.. if its good and from God I
hope you get it :)
I will be logging in from time to time I hope to clear the archives. I
like doing it, deleting everything I've written -
God blessSteve: Of course, I can't express anything from Bruce. I can only express from a loving influence which you seem now to give to me in part. I like it because I hate the stress that you impose on my soul. It hurts very much. So, thanks for these weak, tenuous words, and I hope that you know that your place is better than mine.Steve