Fwd: Re: JvH, Edith Maryon: who needs Christ?
- Tom wrote: "So, Ottmar, maybe these "Young Turks" that you describe are
really throwing some welcome buckets of nice Ahrimanic "ice water" onto
the overheated minds and sentimentalized souls of those anthroposophists
described by Sardello."
Yeah, that's something like it.
The way I see it, the young intellectuals who wish to disregard, dismiss
the importance of the Christ event are inadvertently trivializing
Anthroposophy, on behalf of no other that Sorath.
In my opinion, Sorathian occult forces somehow work their way through
the 'intellectual exercise' of the thinking spirit, they also manage to
hold back the individual 'I' from consciously beholding the Spirit
realm, they try to maintain exclusive implementation (almost by force
but sometimes with blatant force) over the collective human conscious
Etheric consciousness is the only escape that I'm aware of and this
requires developed, living, cosmic, (devachanic) Christic knowledge.
The sentimental, luciferic seething qualities of certain Anthro souls
are guaranteed to be rectified through each one's own effort at pressing
themselves to further, then further more (etc) develop their
Anthroposophic oriented life studies.
Idealistic you might think.
I think it's called 'base neccesity'.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "tmasthenes13" <TomBuoyed@...>
> --- In email@example.com, "tmasthenes13"
> TomBuoyed@ wrote:
> Ottmar wrote:
> Judith's effect on the anthroposophical world?
> Rejection and hatred, ridicule, envy, fear, curiosity, adoration. All
> of this and the speculations on her incarnation may mean strong
> astral attacks, of course. There are those who want to gain
> recognition in the academic or political world. For them JvH is an
> For Judith von Halle the Mystery of Golgotha is at the very centre of
> human history and the involution/evolution of the cosmos. She
> stresses this again and again. That comes at a time when very strong
> voices in the anthroposophic media in Germany (magazines, internet)
> and some parts of the Anthr. Society claim, that it was only a
> concession to the European cultural context at the turn of the 19th
> to 20th century, that Steiner gave so much emphasis on Jesus Christ
> and the Mystery of Golgotha. These young intellectual
> anthroposophists say you can do without the historic Jesus Christ
> etc., that's even a more advanced state of the Bewußtseinsseele
> (consciousness soul?). Be glad that this discussion hasn't arrived in
> the English speaking world, yet.
> Many thanks for answering my questions about Judith. I was most
> intrigued by the section above where you speak about the new
> generation of "intellectual anthroposophists" who, in rejecting the
> centrality of Christ, may be ushering in our next stage of advancement
> in the Consciousness Soul Age.
> I wonder if you could sketch in a background about them, perhaps give
> some names, books, articles, and/or web links. I assume that this
> movement predominates in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, so I would
> appreciate links in German was well. I think it is high time that this
> discussion begin in our English speaking world.
> Such an attitude is part of our 21st Century Zeitgeist, i.e. temporary
> Archai Michael. And we can witness it in the stark existential despair
> felt by Mother Theresa, who admitted that she had no conviction that
> God was there at all in her life.
> I'm reminded of what C.S. Lewis said, perhaps in response to his many
> discussions with Owen Barfield: "If Jesus Christ did not exist, then
> we would have to invent Him!"
> What if we have invented Him?
> Now, in the year 2007, as the Asuric power, which is reflective of
> Archai/Zeitgeist level, begins to strengthen, then it is no surprise
> that this idea would find its way into anthroposophy: what if there is
> no Jesus Christ? What if the Mystery of Golgotha was Steiner's
> ultimate fantasy of "wishful thinking?" Who needs it, as it was
> Steiner's historical, cultural concession?
> Yet such an idea may actually be health-giving and life-giving because
> it certainly becomes a necessary counter-weight to balance out the
> Luciferic excess and pious sentimentality of those who have
> over-romanticized anthroposophy into their own version of some sappy
> Christian religion. And I don't mean the Christian Community here; in
> fact, I would actually exempt most of them, since most of them strike
> me as very down to earth, realistic and humble, compared to so many
> "dedicated Anthros."
> Here I would like to quote Robert Sardello, founder of the School of
> Spiritual Psychology, from his Foreword to the Gerhard Wehr book "Jung
> and Steiner: The Birth of a New Psychology"
> In speaking about the placement of Christ at the center of
> anthroposophy and the importance of Christ to Jung, Sardello writes on
> pp. 28-29:
> "Unfortunately, in anthroposophy, this focus [on Christ] is almostworking
> always sentimentalized., although Steiner does not sentimentalize it.
> He underwent a profound spiritual experience that showed him something
> of the true mysteries of Christ, reorienting the direction of
> anthroposophy. But when the meditative side of Steiner's work is not
> practiced, the central freedom of the human being slides into a veiled
> religion, justified by Steiner's esoteric Christian viewpoint.
> Anthroposophy is practiced as a Christian religion (although this is
> vehemently denied).
> Many anthroposophists want to have it both ways. They want to
> experience themselves as completely free "I-Beings," but they also
> want to believe that Christ is working in them ¬¬ without
> through all the baggage of Christian belief that each and everyone------------------------------------------------------------------------\
> lives, whether Christian or not."
> So, Ottmar, maybe these "Young Turks" that you describe are really
> throwing some welcome buckets of nice Ahrimanic "ice water" onto the
> overheated minds and sentimentalized souls of those anthroposophists
> described by Sardello.
> --- End forwarded message ---