Re: Gulags for Anthros?
- --- In email@example.com, "carol" <organicethics@...>
> What's in the second place, Val?
> It's 'being' in the most modern conception of the word (philosophy).
> It's standing in the light of Spirit, in full conciousness. (And
> Ahrimanic sun as referred to so often by Bradford).sculpture
> It's living at the soul level, the experience which Steiner's
> of the Christ depicted- of being able to balance one's conscioussoul
> between Lucifer's and Ahriman's 'magnetism'. (figurativelyspeaking) And
> directing one's will accordingly. (spiritual freedom)Well then Carol, it seems to me that Anthroposophy is in need of a
> At this could be called the beginnings.
good rallying cry! I suggest "To Know and Live Free". I figure this
would scare the shit out of the "anti-evolutionary supra-political
power occultists" whoever they may be. We could have a little motto
for our list, we could be Anthroposophy-To Know, To Stand, To Live
Free or something... I don't know much about the "anti-evolutionary
supra-political power occultists" but from the college and university
solicitations that we receive daily it appears that they're very big
on mottos. Latin mottos, of course, which makes you feel immediately
like you're some kind of insider when you get the translation. Like
you're in the know, you know? Anthroposophy's kinda like that and
being that it's already Greek perhaps Anthroposohists will think we
don't need a motto but that's the beauty of it, I think because it's
a reverse process.-Val
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Robert Mason
> I don't object to the mere fact that my view isI'm sorry you feel that way.-Val
> being challenged; I was inviting a discussion.
> But so far you haven't shown me anything that
> convinces me that your "challenge" is well-
> founded in this case. And now it seems to me
> that our discussion has reached an impasse, a
> dead end; you're not saying anything really
> new. So I don't see any point in my