--- In email@example.com, "avarohanam" <avarohanam@...>
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "carol" <organicethics@>
> > This is in no way the only proof of 'foul play'. (I noticed that
> > concerted effort was employed in various ways to seed confusion,
> > trivialize Anthroposophy etc...) Through the following
> > becomes totally clear that Avarohanam is a man, and in
> > it is easy to see that chanting Om is working along side him (in
> > certain sense). Also, in the last example, Avarohanam
> > Mark with the content of a so called dream. Avarohanam seems to
> > quite well the nature of the intrusive technologies being
> > unknowing populations...
> Knowledge is structured in consciousness.
I think that Mark tells you what he thinks you want to hear. From
both sides of the genitative perspective, he gives forth cleverness
that bestows a certain renown. It is the belief that he/she speaks
out of honest travels into spiritland, but yet knows it can't truly
wrest its inherent personality from the matter of the physical body
with its luciferic, ahrimanic, and yes, oh-so asuric ego.