Re: spirituality and anthroposophy
- Bruce and all-
I'm terribly sorry. I thought that Michael's initial email went
unanswered. Not sure how I missed the replies that were
posted but going back again I see that the question I asked was
--- In email@example.com, "888" <bhive@a...> wrote:
> >(Fortunately you wake up earlier in Australia...
> >I like that feeling -actualised throuigh internet- of the sun
> >earth, touching first you, later Europe, even later USA etc.)
> Dear Michael,
> Last New Year was a once in a lifetime
> opportunity to see the Sun waking up the world via satellite TV.
> all closer together as never (well almost) before.
> >But I still do not fully understand what are the Elder Brothers.
> Neither do I. How can we understand anything that is outside
> normal experience?
> What is life like in Orion?
> "Can the subject know the life of his King, or only of those
> similarities so shared between them? The mother-lark may
> the concerns of the mother-wren; nor even (to stretch a point)
> a mother-fox. "
> >How do you know about them and how are you in contact with
> >If they are incarnate, can they be spoken to ... even per
> They can be spoken to if you happen to meet one of them. But
> you would only realise what had happened after the meeting.
> Steiner said:
> "people would often be surprised to in what simple,
> form these
> Masters are to be found in all countries. They are present on
> physical plane."
> Yes there has been email discussion. The communication is
> >What are the differences in aproach and contend to
> >you mention?
> There is not an emphasis on Cosmology- that has been well
> previous works, and who can say they have absorbed all of
> You can decide for yourself about the approach:
> I wouldn't say that the material there is fully representative but
> will give you some idea.
> One difference in these teachings has been the appearance
> appearance) of Christ in the Akashic Record. This is very
> because it challenges us to think esoterically. I will gather
> and summarise the arguments in another post.
> >Other question:
> >Can you or anybody tell me whether groups apart from
> >speak about Christs reappearence in the etheric world?
> I don't know if there are any authors that speak of this, that
> connected to Steiner in some way- except those on
> Heindel seems stuck on the idea that Christ is an Archangel.
> I believe the people are having experiences similar to what
> described- they have reached an extremely low point in their
> then Christ appears to them and speaks words of comfort. I
> woman in particular, who had this experience, and even saw
> Christ's Blood fell to earth that the whole world changed. She
> excited when a friend sent her Steiner's lecture "The
> the Blood" and found that someone else had seen this.
> Christ is a gentle Master and I believe He only appears to
> times of desparation because otherwise His presence would
> overwhelming. (It would inhibit our free will.) When He comes
> to stay - your life being totally altered. It is not possilbe to
> the experience and then go on the same way as before.
> >And if yes are there parallels to Ben Aharons description of
> >impact of what happended after 1933 on this?
> I don't have Ben Aharon's book. Could you give us a few
> Robert's Powell's suggestion of the 33 1/3 year cycle has been
> by the Brothers, BTW.
> Friendly Regards,