- I have met 'antrops' that have studied connection with
Kaspaur Hauser and Diana Princess of Wales. Dont know
if any on this site have any further information. Robin
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
- "[We recall, however, that the DNA test on Kaspar Hauser (who
incidentally, was fatally stabbed on this day, 14th December, 1833)
run by German magazine "Der Spiegel" at the Universities of Munich
and Birmingham in 1996 was shown in subsequent years and by a second
DNA test in 2002 (University of Munster) to have been a complete
fake, because the blood sample tested in 1996 had nothing to do with
You would think that if had a feeling for the connection you offered
to Diana and Kaspar, you might have offered a little more than a
mouse squeak. Like, look, do you mean truly or vaguely that
something like Diana and Kaspar are something like JFK/MLK Jr/Robert
Kennedy...oops three in a row, but obviously there is no connection
to Kaspar, or is there? Reichstag fire/9/11....Oh gee, Bradford, you
think that there is something going on?
Well since this was a new one on me, I took the time to hear a voice
which I thought summed it up relatively intelligently.
"...You only need listen to the interview with the academic in the
second hour of the programme, which has nothing to do with 'the
facts' or the 'hard evidence' and hear how the academic is egged on
by McNaughtie to explain the obsessions of the detested 'conspiracy
theorists' and note that McNaughtie seems to know the points the
academic is going to make before he makes them. Then you only need
to put that together with the recent report from the French
authorities (and given much publicity by the reliable, friendly,
balanced old Beeb) that conveniently came out after a 7 year
interval (!) on the 8th December (rather like Osama popping up 'on
video' just before the 2004 US Presidential elections) 'proving'
that "DNA Testing" (we prostrate ourselves before the holy words)
had shown that the blood samples did indeed come from Henri Paul and
matched DNA samples from his family members. [We recall, however,
that the DNA test on Kaspar Hauser (who incidentally, was fatally
stabbed on this day, 14th December, 1833) run by German
magazine "Der Spiegel" at the Universities of Munich and Birmingham
in 1996 was shown in subsequent years and by a second DNA test in
2002 (University of Munster) to have been a complete fake, because
the blood sample tested in 1996 had nothing to do with Kaspar
Hauser! The scientists had examined the DNA sample in good faith and
were not to know where it had come from!]
From the BBC website (http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressr
The DNA tests were carried out in France within the last year,
according to a source close to the French authorities. A DNA profile
was taken from Henri Paul's blood samples and compared with his
parents' DNA. They matched.
"...within the last year..." I wonder why......?
"A source close to the French authorities"......hmmm.
taken from which blood samples......?
Then you can connect all the above-mentioned BBC items with the FACT
that the week before the Stevens report, the BBC started a 4 part
series called "The Conspiracy Files" (the title couldn't just
possibly have anything to do with an allusion to "The X Files",
could it?) which examines why people go for conspiracies. They
began - 4 days before the Stevens Report came out - with "How Diana
In other words, is it not just possible that the BBC and the
Establishment are doing their damnedest to make sure that this one
is nailed down, that it is given the awesome 'closure' (time to stop
thinking now, folks!), that the Stevens Report somehow is ensconced
in the national memory banks like the official reports into JFK,
RFK, Martin Luther King, Oklahoma and 9-11, requiring only periodic
boosters (TV documentaries and the like) on anniversaries to keep
the lie fixed in the minds of the public like a mental vaccination
against the truth. And I say all this without having even read the
Stevens report, which I shall now do.....
Many people believe Diana was a shallow insignificant individual and
that arguments about her death are as nothing compared to the great
issues of the day such as global warming, Darfur, the Health Service
etc, but - arguments about the quality of her individuality aside -
let us just imagine what it would mean IF it were conclusively
proven and accepted that Diana had been killed by British
intelligence with the connivance of US Secret Service and certain
members of the Royal Family. Or, for that matter, if it had been
proven that JFK had been killed not by Oswald or even by 'renegade
members' of the CIA, but rather on the orders of key figures within
the US establishment? Or that 9-11 was staged by forces within the
US establishment itself to justify the War On Terror? In all these
cases, the UK and US establishments would suffer blows from which
they might not recover. This would likely have knock-on effects
on 'the great issues of the day'. Everything would be up for
question; mental habits might finally be put aside and the veils of
authority finally drop. In Britain, the monarchy remains the
lynchpin of the Establishment. This is why next year we shall have
had to wait 10 years for a British inquest and why it will reach the
same result as the French inquiry, the Stevens Report and the BBC
documentaries. This is why the death of Diana is significant. They
know this and thus the facts of the conspiracies must be suppressed
or disguised. Hence the Warren Commission Report...the 9-11
Report...and now the Stevens Report."