Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

R: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man's sport

Expand Messages
  • VALENTINA BRUNETTI
    Hi people, Does not tell something to you that BOTH Dubya and Kerry were -and are- part of Skull & Bones ? Andrea ... Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 6:16
    Message 1 of 2 , Sep 15, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
       Hi people,
      Does not tell something to you that BOTH Dubya and Kerry were -and are- part of Skull & Bones ?
       
      Andrea
       
      ----- Original Message -----
       
       
      Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 6:16 AM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man's sport

      The two-party system may at times express forms of beauty,
      but it is doomed to failure.
       
      In a not too distant future, there will either be stringent almost total complete government/banking/power broker/
      corporate/economic control of the internet (where voting will be applied), thus both parties (if they still exist) will
      be basically the same (have no effective meaning), or there will thrive a freedom-loving participatory democracy where the
      two-party system is dissolved, the middleman elected representative no longer an entity, and all peoples will
      vote together by themselves, for themselves and decide on all issues themselves in totality.
       
      This will be one of the titantic struggles of the 21st century, who really will control the Internet
      (There will be new Internets to come, the WWWeb being only just one).
       
       
      Hogie
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Br. Ron
      Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:32 PM
      Subject: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man's sport

      It may be stated thus:
       
      Republicans basically engender Self Reliance
      while the Democrats enable Social Dependence.
       
      (Spiritually, the former expresses the Father Principle
      while the latter expresses the Mother)
       
      We really do need both cosmic genders, don't we?
      This is the beauty of the two party system.
       
      If one's desire is individuality and personal sovereignty,
      then one should vote Republican
       
      If one feels the need to be nurtured and governed
      then the Democratic party should be the choice.
       
      Said another way, Conservatives believe in maintaining
      tradition along with it's familial borders and boundaries.
      Liberals seek to dissolve them.
       
      The political choices we make reveal our personal
      approach to the Principle of Evil. One choice generally seeks to
      protect against parasitism and vampirism while the other seeks
      to deny it. ("ignore Evil and it will go away")
       
      The Mother Principle is Democratic and nurtures everything
      in the Nature's garden including the weeds and mosquitoes...
      while it's the Father's job to protect Her creations by calmly
      and dispassionately killing those parasitic little bastards
      regardless of how much She protests.
       
       
      Solve et Coagula
       
      Br. Ron
       
      ________________________________________


      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy
      Unsubscribe:
      anthroposophy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
      List owner:  anthroposophy-owner@yahoogroups.com 





      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy
      Unsubscribe:
      anthroposophy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
      List owner:  anthroposophy-owner@yahoogroups.com 



    • VALENTINA BRUNETTI
      ... From: Br. Ron To: anthroposophy@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man s sport
      Message 2 of 2 , Sep 15, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
         
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Br. Ron
        Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:53 PM
        Subject: Re: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man's sport


         
            >Hi people,
            >Does not tell something to you that BOTH Dubya and Kerry
            >were -and are- part of Skull & Bones ?
         
            >Andrea
         
         
        Hi list.
        Here you can find how mr BR put in prctice the exercise to put on others' mouth words that they  never said.
         
         Listen:
         
        Do tell us what you know about Yale and
        the 'Skull and Bones.'
         
           
        A:     Are we at exame entrance or what ? ( hi, kid tell me, who was Folcacchiero de'Folcacchieri ? )
         
        Anyway, the main outward  resources about S & B are the basic  Sutton's book, the recent "Fleshing out Skull & Bones"  (by varoious authors) and A.Robbins' work, thatt, in my opinion, is a try to picture them as "harmless".
        Surely, in order to manage the data  a basic knowledge of the story of Occult and esoteric brotheroods is requested and , most of all, a good training in Anthroposophy.
         
        Tell my teacher , do I deserve a good mark ?
         
         
        Both Kerry and Dubya are 'evil.'
        Is this your point, Andrea?
         
        A:
        "Evil" ? 
          If you are actually  interested in my opinion about "evil" in history pls heve a look at some posts of mine on AT, mainly the ones recently written  on "Lodges" and "Conspiracy" thread
        (Paganini non replica!!)
         
        Or is it just America in general that is Sorathic?
         
        A
        :Who said that ?
        ( Anyway,  If you were really interested in my work (uh uh uh ) you should have found that I. for good occult reason, DO NOT use such a word , neither as a proper name, nor as an adjective)
         
         
        Or perhaps it's the entirety of civilization and traditional
        culture that you find oppressive to your appreciation of
        the unbounded.
         
          A:
         Who said that ?
         
         
        To dress the love of anarchy in the robes of Anthroposophy
        is not unlike putting lipstick on a pig. It's but a vain attempt
        to make hatred appear beautiful.
         
         A:
        Where I wrote to    be   an  anarchist , pls ?
         
        Sadly, in the fiery crucible of Life, it's always 'the hater' who
        burns first......not the hated.
         
        Burnings?
         
        A: Hi,man wake up!!
        The Middle Age is over!
         
        What else?
         
         
         
         
         
        ----- Original Message -----
         
         
        Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 6:16 AM
        Subject: Re: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man's sport

        The two-party system may at times express forms of beauty,
        but it is doomed to failure.
         
        In a not too distant future, there will either be stringent almost total complete government/banking/power broker/
        corporate/economic control of the internet (where voting will be applied), thus both parties (if they still exist) will
        be basically the same (have no effective meaning), or there will thrive a freedom-loving participatory democracy where the
        two-party system is dissolved, the middleman elected representative no longer an entity, and all peoples will
        vote together by themselves, for themselves and decide on all issues themselves in totality.
         
        This will be one of the titantic struggles of the 21st century, who really will control the Internet
        (There will be new Internets to come, the WWWeb being only just one).
         
         
        Hogie
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Br. Ron
        Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:32 PM
        Subject: [anthroposophy] Politics: a thinking man's sport

        It may be stated thus:
         
        Republicans basically engender Self Reliance
        while the Democrats enable Social Dependence.
         
        (Spiritually, the former expresses the Father Principle
        while the latter expresses the Mother)
         
        We really do need both cosmic genders, don't we?
        This is the beauty of the two party system.
         
        If one's desire is individuality and personal sovereignty,
        then one should vote Republican
         
        If one feels the need to be nurtured and governed
        then the Democratic party should be the choice.
         
        Said another way, Conservatives believe in maintaining
        tradition along with it's familial borders and boundaries.
        Liberals seek to dissolve them.
         
        The political choices we make reveal our personal
        approach to the Principle of Evil. One choice generally seeks to
        protect against parasitism and vampirism while the other seeks
        to deny it. ("ignore Evil and it will go away")
         
        The Mother Principle is Democratic and nurtures everything
        in the Nature's garden including the weeds and mosquitoes...
        while it's the Father's job to protect Her creations by calmly
        and dispassionately killing those parasitic little bastards
        regardless of how much She protests.
         
         
        Solve et Coagula
         
        Br. Ron
         
        ________________________________________


        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy
        Unsubscribe:
        anthroposophy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
        List owner:  anthroposophy-owner@yahoogroups.com 





        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy
        Unsubscribe:
        anthroposophy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
        List owner:  anthroposophy-owner@yahoogroups.com 





        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy
        Unsubscribe:
        anthroposophy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
        List owner:  anthroposophy-owner@yahoogroups.com 





        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy
        Unsubscribe:
        anthroposophy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
        List owner:  anthroposophy-owner@yahoogroups.com 



      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.