14100Re: I don't see it.
- Sep 1, 2007Steve, I'll give you credit for placing your primary focus of the
Because recognition of a primary science of the Etheric is what we
(all humanity) needs (as it's key) to move forward within
But you're lacking in details.
Perhaps tomorrow, I'll write out something.
--- In email@example.com, "Stephen Hale" <sardisian01@...>
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "carol" organicethics@ wrote:
> > This subject in general requires from me great concentration on
> > sequences of details. Spiritual ones as they relate to physical
> > And I require that they be presented as clearly and truthfully asreasons
> > possible (No skipping around from one great idea to another with
> > of vagueness and doubt in between. ). This explains one of the
> > why I have such an aversion to non Anthroposophic Theosophy.body
> > I can't handle chaos, especially on this level....
> I don't really understand what you're saying above, but I will try to
> make it clearer in terms of the subject. Earth received the mineral
> substance that formed on the moon. Thus, the mineral kingdom does not
> have its origination on earth; only its effect on earth. By receiving
> the mineral substance from the moon, the earth was required to give up
> its original nature, which was like the other planets, which then
> passed over to the moon, making the moon hard, durable, and very
> heavy. And thus, the needed counterweight was born. The earth, as
> such, is singularly mineral in the universe. Therefore, nothing like
> it, before or since. In other words, the earth as the fourth sphere
> contains an element that needed the Christ to incarnate at the mid-
> point of earth evolution.
> So, earth gave up its original and diaphenous etheric nature, which is
> what truly exists on the other sacred planets today, for the needed
> substance that would give it strength, both internally and externally.
> The other planets are etheric bodies, while the earth is a mineral
> existing nowhere else in the universe. Thus, the earth and the moon
> are both anomalies. The earth has what was formed on the moon, and the
> moon has what was formed on the earth, as a great exchange which
> spiritual science attempts to fully describe to the thinking mind who
> is receptive to it.
> And one of the proofs, in addition to the 8th sphere's existence as
> previously described, concerns the mystery of the pyramids of the
> ancient Egyptian Cultural Epoch. For herein, we have the riddle that
> remains today of the deeply secret knowledge that this former epoch
> understood about this great interchange between the moon and the
> earth. And it was embodied, as well, in the riddle of the Sphinx.
> Thus, the moon is shaped as a sphere, as the other planets are also
> shaped as spheres, because sphericity denotes an etheric nature, and
> the moon holds what was originally on the earth. The earth, on the
> other hand, is shaped differently; more in like of the pyramids that
> were built in that previous epoch that our fifth epoch pays homage to
> in the esoteric sense.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>