11564Re: Amoeba contra Manu
- Oct 6, 2006Dear Godot,
Perhaps next time around you'll possess the great courage necessary
to take on the `big picture'. Please take note that your inner urge
to directly wrestling with Anthroposophy has now
figuratively `sprinkled your soul with a light drizzle'.
May the heavens ray down upon you... in sympathy, Carol
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "opetha" <opetha@...> wrote:
> Good day,
> THERE IS NO RELIGION HIGHER THAN WROTH !
> Your thoughts are valued, bradford. It doesn't matter in the end,
> all have our own opinions and beliefs. And mine, personally: I
> rather opt with the planetary show of karma than the idea of the
> and 72. If only more people would look at their progressed
> they, including old milky, would see the troubles in there (33,
> or whenever)transient, yes, but still very deadly.
> Look at Nelson Mandala's progressed horoscope, it had
> saturn (detri in Cancer, incarceration) forming square to Pluto
> he went to prison between 1968-1984, this type of life aspect
> long time because of the planets slow speed holding out. This
> never known to fail, and like your interpretations of synchronicity
> , and the whole of spirituality, it is not founded by
> (a) energy
> or (b) causality
> Your etheric christ comes from WITHOUT mine from WITHIN. Jung was
> a spiritualist and looked at the fair, subjective, empiricism of
> SELF, which is the centre of the Karma wheel. Christ, for me, was
> tempted my Satan in the desert as Buddha was by Mara under the
> tree. To understand Jung you have to forsake ideas of spirit and
> energy and INSTITUTIONAL truths for the IMMORTAL truths. His
> quaternary of the types balanced all viewpoints, and thus the
> was a still and eternal image of gracious compromise between the
> types, not "melancholic" STEREOtypes (.....most clown-faced goths
> have a Gemini--air--attribute and are rational function types).
> Saying jung was a rubbish spiritualist is like a Muslim saying
> the holocaust was a stunt by the Jews, its an institutional truth
> a nominalist mind. It's just not everyone's duty to see life from
> bottom upwards and understand an empirical foundation for the
> sheer "art" of their colourful, energic, spiritual way.
> "DE FABIS ABSTINUTO"
> --- In email@example.com, "holderlin66" <holderlin66@>
> > Godot wrote:
> > "A few days ago there was that guy who walked into an Amish
> > and shot 11 girls in the back of the head, to be crude I will
> > him as an example of someone who can be cured by analytical
> > psychology, but NOT by anthroposophy, becase he cannot take the
> > leaps of faith and consequent thought-excersizes up in the stars
> > until he confronts himself on the Earth, no matter
> > how "scavangering" this will be to him. You want to propound
> > science through cosmic rhetoric more than you want to heal, is
> > not so?"
> > "You know, Christ was crucified at age 33," says actor-turned-
> > writer/director Peter Berg, "and they say Buddha came out of the
> > forest and attained enlightenment at 33. It's a critical age for
> > men. I'm 35 now. But when I was 33, I started writing Very Bad
> > Things."
> > Bradford comments;
> > Let's take a look at this 32 year old milk delivery human being.
> > Firstly it is known that 30 to 34 is the age of going Postal.
> > can understand what this 33 year mid-line earthly biographical
> > means better than the current Jungians.
> > John Belushi overdosed and dead at 33. Chris Farley dead at age
> > Thomas Jefferson (April 13, 1743-July 4, 1826) is known the
> > over as the principal author, in 1776 at age 33, of the
> > of Independence; as author of the Bill for Establishing
> > Freedom instituting separation of church and state in Virginia.
> > María Eva Duarte de Perón, alias Evita died at the age of 33, at
> > 8:23 p.m. on July 26, 1952.
> > 1987 (Age 32) BILL GATES
> > Age 32 1987 - Windows 2.0
> > (1988 BILL GATES - AGE 33 MICROSOFT WINDOWS)
> > In 1836 Emerson was 33. In the summer of 1836 within the space
> > just two months, Emerson met Margaret Fuller who would become
> > the most significant intellectual relationships of his life; he
> > finished and published his first book, Nature, and he met with
> > friends to plan an ongoing symposium on new religious and
> > philosophical thought which would begin the movement eventually
> > labeled "Transcendentalism."
> > The Human Life by George O'Neil
> > " Great Book On Biography and Spirituality, July 25, 2005
> > George O'Neil did a great job by writing this study of
> > The book describes the unfolding of the human life in terms of
> > year cycles and the challenges we face in keeping up the
> > of being human. Every seven years a new task lies ahead
> > after the age of 27 when most humans cease to develop inwardly.
> > book goes into detail about the need to understand the
> > a continuing self - education. There are some great chapters on
> > karmic companions, moon nodes etc.
> > In any case the book comes with a life chart or life map. The
> > has four perspectives: the physical, life, passions and idea,
> > karmic levels. The life chart is really brilliantly conceived
> > personlly fill it out every birthday. After several years I find
> > myself able to recall in an artistic way very intimate details,
> > unresolved conflicts etc. by redoing and studying this chart.
> > George included and made practical a wealth of Steiner's work
> > insight. This wise and neglected book is difficult to attain
> > through amazon. It is not clear whether there is in fact a
> > Press in existence. Those who can find the book have a real gem."
> > Bradford concludes;
> > Life is a blur or Life is truly biographical science. Previously
> > have examined that the etheric heart of the human being matures
> > first a pure cosmic picture in the baby; the etheric heart and
> > change of teeth makes further adapations to the cosmic heart;
> > astral heart arises with sexual maturity and further astral and
> > personality forces that are woven into it; and finally the I AM
> > heart emerges in this specific age range field where we find the
> > human being dead center, mid-point, at the most human, at 33
> > of age, between the points of 0 to 72. 72 years looking back to
> > when Steiner himself would have been 72 years of age. It is
> > who locked down for eternity the date Feb. 27, 1933.
> > What happens when the I AM and ripened heart condition is
> > all its depth? The milk delivery man had a dark secret. It
> > his inner eye as he approached 32 years of age. According to
> > have as information it came up to haunt him with powerful
> > intensity and GUILT.
> > But there is a critical learning point of development when we
> > understand the Science and psychological unfolding of the human
> > being, because there are standard and complex ripening forces
> > truly lead to the ultimate challenge of the fully conscious, I
> > human exposed heart. Zarathustra was able to fully step away
> > his bodily penetration of Jesus, first at twelve years of age,
> > Zarathustra had collected all his former wisdom, and entered at
> > twelve the other Jesus and penetrated that powerful Jesus, of
> > two Jesus children. Zarathustra then went further to deepen and
> > prepare for his projected intersection, think of the cosmic math
> > interesections of time and agreements between the Angel world
> > Man.
> > But Zarathustra, once having fully penetrated as much as
> > the physical, etheric, astral, sentient, intellectual and
> > consciousness soul fields of the human heart, at the baptism,
> > Zarathustra removed himself consciously and let the Christ
> > and bring to fruition all that humanity carried up to that
> > Zarathustra expanded away from the physical form and let the
> > take what he, Zarathustra had fully prepared of language, brain,
> > thought cohesion. In other words Zarathustra floated away,
> > down consciously at the fully developed astral, the fully
> > etheric, all running on their own now, on automatic pilot, fully
> > function and conscious digestion, will, physical movement, and
> > fully running I AM replication as was possible for Zarathustra
> > hold onto. Zarathustra and The Fifth Gospel of Steiner's depicts
> > amazing glance back on the form, and consciousness that
> > watched outside of his body as Christ entered the finest
> > human vehicle every set free by a human maker and let this
> > living force be overshadowed and endowed with the Mighty Sun
> > Christ.
> > It is a magnificent tale that tells us the reality that
> > had been able to give as gifts a clarified etheric, and a
> > astral and finally the automatic pilot on the deepest wisdom
> > condensed....Zarathustra, like Sting of the Police, if you love
> > someone set them free... but this was set free or given as a
> > something of outstanding import. And I'm afraid we don't examine
> > the details as clearly as we could. Therefore these additional
> > insights on the Science of the I AM, are left untouched
> > Steiner was shaken to his roots as he attempted to convey these
> > mysteries to us.
> > Now how does our higher I AM come into the realm of sifting each
> > thread and impulse of our conscience in order to have the I AM
> > fully consciously in an area of our being somewhere around 33.
> > Jefferson at 33. Jefferson had brought his I AM into the region
> > the objectified forces of the Intellectual Soul and brought this
> > AM overshadowing into the thought code of America. Emerson felt
> > karma and arising Transcendentalists and Romantics the world
> > and Emerson reached out to those of like hearts and minds,
> > Shakespeare, Grimm. Emerson as the Roman who wrote about the
> > event at the time of Nero as Tacitus sought his deeper karmic
> > with living consciousness. Emerson sought his deeper karmic
> > Where can you ever hear such a thing with precision science of
> > viewing the relation between Tacitus and Pliny the Younger?
> > Tacitus/Emerson's close mentored friend was Pliny the Younger or
> > Herman Grimm. These two went back a long, long way. And Emerson
> > his powerful intellect reaches out to the Consciousness Soul
> > community of mankind in his Representative Men. And Steiner
> > his profound Greek/Wooden, Athenian statue, The Representative
> > Humanity. Where are we required to take these insights?
> > Now in which direction and how we study these events, as the
> > of biography, including Bill Gates and his unfolding force at
> > to 35 reveals also a very dangerous and interesting
> > with introspection into the well, the deep well of the I AM and
> > structure of the whole CONSCIENCE. You may ask what we can tell
> > Jungians about the science and speed bumps of biography. I'd say
> > could tell Jungians a great deal. Why son, I have a whole list
> > insights that would shake vague Jungians out of their hiding
> > in the bushes.
> > This is all that you need to remember about the difference
> > Jung and Steiner. Jung is Anthroposophy lite!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>