Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Fwd: Tall Skeleton discussion

Expand Messages
  • Rick O
    Angus McGaskill had an 80 chest in life and he was only 7 9 . Of course, having meat on the bones would make a big difference... ... 2C1A9649C946397D6CF ...
    Message 1 of 14 , Jan 7, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Angus McGaskill had an 80 chest in life and he was "only" 7'9". Of course, having meat on the bones would make a big difference...


      --- In ancient_waterways_society@yahoogroups.com, "bigalemc2" wrote:
      >
      > I found this NY Time article (pdf of the original article):Giant
      > Skeletons Found [Feb 11, 1902]
      >
      2C1A9649C946397D6CF>
      > about giant skeletons found buried on a ranch in New Mexico.
      > "...not less than 12 feet tall..."
      > "...forearm was 4 feet long..." [including the hand? Otherwise this one
      > sounds bogus on a 12 foot human --- WAY out of proportion...]
      > "...chest is reported to have a circumference of seven feet..." [84" !
      > ! !]
      > Steve Garcia
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.