Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: My ATM sent messsage regarding Brad Lepper [not yet approved]

Expand Messages
  • james m clark jr
    Hey Will, I have no intention to debate archaeology it s the philosophy that doesn t promote good science or archaeology that I would be concerned about. That
    Message 1 of 3 , Mar 23, 2012
      Hey Will,

      I have no intention to debate archaeology it's the philosophy that doesn't promote good science or archaeology that I would be concerned about. That is my passion. I'm not concerned about his issues or the mysterious hole in his pocket. Even more concerned about those listed amongst him. You just can't rub him off and leave him in the Yoder's
      clogged washway just below the feeding canopy. I guess you could say I need pastserizing myself and this seems to be the right line to address if one is willing and able. I am of course remind of Ancient American Magizine... well done, well written regarding the Lepper vs a Lepper scholar.

      be well,

      --- In ancient_waterways_society@yahoogroups.com, William Conner <conner6343@...> wrote:
      > Jamey:
      > Don't waste your time debating archeology with Brad Lepper. He is strictly a
      > party line pro archie and confusing him with solid evidence to the contrary is
      > useless. Consider this: as I explain in detail in my book "Iron Age America:
      > Before Columbus," iron furnaces of a type last used in Europe before 1492 were
      > constructed and used by someone in prehistoric Ohio. The diagnostic artifact,
      > the glass covered hearth stone, was found at 35 sites in south central Ohio in
      > boggy terrain where bog ore is found.  The most important artifact I found back
      > in the 1990s when I was working in the field was a cast iron hand axe. To date,
      > this is the world'sonly cast iron hand axe.
      > The glazed stones were used to form the hearth of these furnaces and the glass
      > that covers the stones melts away from the ore as it forms a "bloom" of cast
      > iron. Lepper knows me and knows about my archaeology. I have even appeared as
      > a speaker at meeting where Lepper also gave a talk. Lepper also knows about my
      > background as a science colunist for newspapers, a fomer member of the Bell Labs
      > public relations staff and former editor of a Washington, DC telecommunications
      > newsletter.Â
      > It is Lepper who is close to practicing a "religion" when he is working with
      > scant evidence based upon very few known facts about Ohio's so-called
      > prehistoric "Mound Builders."Â Â This isn't Lepper's fault, because not much is
      > known about them. But it seems to me Lepper is having too much fun bugging
      > folks who are interested in unorthodox archaeolgy...Â
      > William Conner, author
      > "Iron Age America: Before Columbus"
      > Â
      > ________________________________
      > From: james m clark jr <jameyboy@...>
      > To: ancient_waterways_society@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Fri, March 23, 2012 12:59:47 PM
      > Subject: [ancient_waterways_society] My ATM sent messsage regarding Brad Lepper
      > [not yet approved]
      > Â
      > #4413 Not So Lost Ancient Civilizations
      > Another review with Brad Lepper again?
      > I reviewed very little of this part two segment for now. I'm not a deffusionist,
      > if so considered I guess I owe it to religious influence as of what little I
      > know is still in question. It didn't take a curator
      > or archaeological scientist to determine the authinticity of the Bat Creek Stone
      > in my case, but the historical research of an 8th grade history teacher who had
      > moved to Bat Creek to teach, that alone is good enough for a historical
      > society... I didn't need a book nor an approval. I simply felt I had read enough
      > about it. Which brings me to Brad Lepper and the former curator of Ohio
      > Archaeological Historical Society to which this article as well as his were
      > written about the same time. Perhaps some defussionist or archaeologist would
      > aquire permission to be digitally transferred to ATM before jumping to
      > conclusions. Some may considrer deffussionist to be some sort of religious
      > movment as adhearing to some philosophy. But to be honest, perhaps someone here
      > could convince Dr. Lepper that there are some new scientific terms at Wikipedia
      > that would be more helpful if he was just a little more considerate sticking to
      > science instead of conducting distateful drama such as this. Facts are facts but
      > there is just a little more to consider. A diffussion of sorts if you will.
      > be well,
      > jamey
      > --- In ArchaeologyTheoryMethod@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <email...> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >http://www.csicop.org/si/show/civilizations_lost_and_found_fabricating_history_-_part_two_false_messages
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.