Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [ancient_waterways_society] Re: Pygmies in North America?

Expand Messages
  • joe white
    O siyo Brothers, and Sisters, The bones in Tennessee are The Cherokee Little People. We have books written about them. You can order these books from our
    Message 1 of 7 , Sep 8, 2010
      O'siyo Brothers, and Sisters,
      The bones in Tennessee are The Cherokee Little People.
      We have books written about them.
      You can order these books from our Cherokee Museum & Cultural Center.
      931 762 3733  Cash, check, or money order.
      Gah gey you e,
      Sitting Owl
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Susan
      Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:45 PM
      Subject: [ancient_waterways_society] Re: Pygmies in North America?


      At least a dozen members here the past couple of years seem to be interested in and have posted about the legendary "Little People",   Puk-Wud-Jies,  Puk Wujinees, and other various names from ancient tribal peoples living along old Great Lakes & Mississippi Riverways.  From the post below are several more messages from a year ago on the subject.  


      Still without  a computer, I have time limits on the library computer but recall an article posted to our site about burial remains of very small adult human skeletons found a century or so ago and caused quite a stir, but soon afterward dismissed by 'authorities' as merely having been been remains left behind by a traveling circus.

      Thanks to all for your continuing interest and Posts to this site.  Once again I doubt I will be able to attend the annual Ancient Artifact Preservation Society/AAPS conference September 17th, 18th, 19th in Marquette, MI, but below is the latest schedule of speakers.  I believe admission to the main day of the conference (Saturday 9AM-10PM EST) is free to educators, but please check with conference chair Judy Johnson.  


      Any of you who attend that or similar conferences this year,  please post comments or summaries to the group.    Susan

       --- In ancient_waterways_society@yahoogroups.com, Martin Carriere <metismartin@...> wrote:
      > The little people were the friends of Quetzlcoatl and were very prominent in the od stories of the growth of the ages of civilization. Many pictures of our ancestors and even those of the old french come up to about 4 1/2 feet or more.
      > Best to all,
      > MC 
      > --- On Mon, 8/30/10, Rick O ozman@... wrote:
      > From: Rick O ozman@...
      > Subject: [ancient_waterways_society] Re: Pygmies in North America?
      > To: ancient_waterways_society@yahoogroups.com
      > Received: Monday, August 30, 2010, 12:56 PM
      > Hi Stan,
      > Both old news hounds and the native traditions were fond of this theme.
      > Barry Fell once chased it to ground at the Smithsonian and supposedly
      > found some of the remains in the ostuary stacks there. I have been
      > trying to get his notes, without success. Some material exists on line
      > relating to his findings.
      > Nutshell version: mainstream says the skeletons were those of seven year
      > old children(roughly eleven thousand described). Fell found tooth wear
      > and joint disease more consistent with 50 year olds.
      > Pukwudjinee is the Ojibwah and Ho 'Chunck name for these diminutive
      > folks. Piankishaw, Potawatamee / Miami and other Algonquin names are
      > very similar.
      > Oz
      > --- In ancient_waterways_society@yahoogroups.com, minnesotastan@
      > wrote:
      > >
      > > The following stories were posted this week at Futility Closet
      > > <http://www.futilitycloset.com/2010/08/26/little-america/> -
      > >
      > > "An ancient graveyard of vast proportions has been found in
      > Coffee
      > > county [Tenn.]. It is similar to those found in White county and other
      > > places in Middle Tennessee, but is vastly more extensive, and shows
      > that
      > > the race of pigmies who once inhabited this country were very
      > numerous.
      > > The same peculiarities of position observed in the White county graves
      > > are found in these. The writer of the letter says:â?" `Some
      > > considerable excitement and curiosity took place a few days since,
      > near
      > > Hillsboro, Coffee county, on James Brown's farm. A man was ploughing
      > > in a field which had been cultivated many years, and ploughed up a
      > > man's skull and other bones. After making further examination they
      > > found that there were about six acres in the graveyard. They were
      > buried
      > > in a sitting or standing position. The bones show that they were a
      > dwarf
      > > tribe of people, about three feet high. It is estimated that there
      > were
      > > about 75,000 to 100,000 buried there. This shows that this country was
      > > inhabited hundreds of years ago.'"
      > > â?" Woodbury [Tenn.] Press, quoted in The Journal of the
      > > Anthropological Institute, Feb. 8, 1876
      > >
      > > "A short distance below Coshocton [Ohio], on one of those
      > elevated,
      > > gravelly alluvions, so common on the rivers of the West, has been
      > > recently discovered a very singular ancient burying ground. From some
      > > remains of wood, still apparent in the earth around the bones, the
      > > bodies seem all to have been deposited in coffins; and what is still
      > > more curious, is the fact that the bodies buried here were generally
      > not
      > > more than from three to four and a half feet in length. They are very
      > > numerous, and must have been tenants of a considerable city, or their
      > > numbers could not have been so great. A large number of graves have
      > been
      > > opened, the inmates of which are all of this pigmy race. No metallic
      > > articles or utensils have yet been found, to throw light on the period
      > > or the nation to which they belonged. Similar burying grounds have
      > been
      > > found in Tennessee, and near St. Louis in Missouri."
      > > â?" The American Journal of Science and Arts, January 1837
      > >
      > > The press in the 19th century was often susceptible to hoaxes
      > (including
      > > self-generated ones for publicity). And archaeological material has
      > > often been misinterpreted by lay persons or inexperienced scientists.
      > I
      > > frankly can't imagine 75,000 burials, even of normal bodies. Has
      > anyone
      > > heard of these "little people" discoveries before? Any information
      > > about followup reports or debunking? If they had been validated, I
      > > would think we would know more about them today. But perhaps the
      > > material was lost and nobody ever tried to followup on the findings.
      > >

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.