Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

### New AAG Interview -- Dr. Robert Baker Jr. ###

Expand Messages
  • Tim Ventura
    Dear Groups: I just finished an audio-interview with Dr. Robert Baker Jr., the creator of http://www.gravwave.com. Dr Baker has done an excellent job
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 26, 2004
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Groups:

      I just finished an audio-interview with Dr. Robert Baker Jr., the creator of
      http://www.gravwave.com Dr Baker has done an excellent job collecting and
      categorizing several different approaches to creating what Dr. Ning Li calls
      "AC-Gravity" -- and he's applied an engineer's eye to reducing the complex
      science to easily understandable techniques for testing these concepts.

      The interview is about 35 minutes long (1.2mb), and available online in
      Windows Media 9 format at:
      http://www.americanantigravity.com/interviews.shtml

      Abstract:

      Beams of directed gravitational-wave energy at high-frequencies, producing
      tons of force, currently under study by both the government and private
      entities. These can be produced through electrical & magnetic jerks, as well
      as continuous-mode effects from high-amplitude RF-signals.

      In the public mind, the work of Eugene Podkletnov is arguably the beginning
      of this type of research, but the achievements since his early experiments
      are considerably more impressive (and much less well known) than the
      mainstream media ever realized. For example, here is a selection from Baker
      about the theoretical possibilities of this technology:

      "Utilizing a HTSC lens for concentrating HFGW power the theoretical
      ten-megawatt pulse output predicted in HFGW -03-107, 380-kilowatt continuous
      power predicted in HFGW -03-117, 11-kilowatt continuous power predicted in
      HFGW -03-106, and the over one-kilowatt pulse power predicted in
      HFGW -03-113 could be concentrated to provide HFGW fluxes in excess of 1020
      [watts/m2]."

      As you can see, we're not talking about a 2% loss in weight -- in fact, the
      limits on this technology are so high that it would be irresponsible NOT to
      experiment with it. The experiments described often require sensitive
      equipment to measure, but more often than not can be conducted using very
      common materials (Baker discusses microwave-oven elements & cell-phone
      emitters as a potential means of transducing MW-frequencies into a
      superconductor).

      Sincerely;

      Tim Ventura
      http://www.americanantigravity.com
      tventura6@...


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.