## AG & Ideal Spacecraft Prop Systems [Article]

Expand Messages
• ANTIGRAVITY AND THE IDEAL SPACECRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEM By Noel Huntley, Ph.D. There is considerable confusion with the concept of antigravity and its related
Message 1 of 1 , Feb 23, 2003
ANTIGRAVITY AND THE IDEAL SPACECRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEM

By Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

There is considerable confusion with the concept of antigravity and its
related subjects. If we imagine a magnet arrangement with one magnet located
stably above another, 'like' poles together, we have repulsion and a magnet
suspended in space. Visually it resembles a form of antigravity but of course
it is no more antigravity than is rocket propulsion.

In this example not only are we not reversing gravity or counteracting it
directly but we are only acting on surfaces (or more strictly, acting with a
2D-to-3D interface), with Newtonian forces. The phenomenon of antigravity, or
gravity, does not function on Newtonian forces (as covered in other web-site
articles).

Let us make a comparison between 1) the above magnetic or electromagnetic
field (magnetic field created by electricity) example, and 2) true
antigravity. Consider the upper magnet, in the above example, held above the
lower magnet by means of strings secured in a horizontal manner so that the
magnet can move vertically. Like poles are facing.

Now let us raise the upper magnet and then release it. Initially it will fall
as a result of the gravitational force being greater than the repulsion
between the magnets. The upper magnet will fall past the balance point owing
to its momentum, mass times velocity, and continue until the repulsive force
is greater than the gravitational force plus the diminishing momentum. Now,
while stationary, with no momentum (no velocity) the repulsion is greater than
the gravitational effect and it will move upwards. Again it moves beyond the
balance point due to momentum, etc. It will thus oscillate with diminishing
amplitude until it settles stationary in the balance point.

If we now consider a similar set up but have an antigravitational field
instead of a magnetic field, what would happen when we raise the upper mass
and let it go? We can consider that the antigravity field has a source below
the suspended object and the field diminishes with distance from the source
appropriately.

When we release the mass it falls since the gravitational effect on the mass
is greater than the antigravitational field at this point. What happens when
the mass reaches the balance point? It stops abruptly. Why?--because there is
no inertia, no momentum , even though the object had velocity. A gravitational
and antigravitational field act 4D to 3D and penetrate totally any mass. There
is no momentum since the antigravitational field and the gravitational field
act instantaneously on all atoms and their nuclei. At the balance point, the
upward thrust on the object from the antigravity is equal to the downward
thrust of gravity. Now this also means of course that an object, in general,
falling under gravity, is not manifesting inertia even though it is
accelerating--there is no gravitational force until the motion is arrested by
a surface, creating a Newtonian force. A falling body is locked on to the
flow; it is not pushing its way through spacetime with inertia and Newtonian
forces. There is a complete failure to grasp this difference (see other web-
site articles).

Now since antimatter would of course relate to antigravity, let us comment on
the antimatter that is speculated to exist in the universe, which if it came
into contact with our matter could annihilate both with the release of
considerable energy. What form would this antimatter take? Could it be that
the electron's (negative) charge is reversed in polarity along with the
reversal of its antiparticle, the positron? This type of reversal wouldn't of
course make any difference--the electron becomes the positron and vice versa.

But what about atoms? Would antimatter have positive particles revolving
around a negative nucleus (the opposite of our atoms). No, this still wouldn't
work--the design of the atom would have to be completely changed and it
wouldn't then respond to our atoms as an opposite to cause complete
annihilation, since this is the test of the true opposite.

The positively charged nucleus at the centre of the atom is a white hole,
which means energy is coming into our 3rd dimension, whereas electrons have
properties similar to black holes--energy spiralling inwards into their
centres and out of the 3rd dimension. If they were reversed, the atom wouldn't
be stable. However, we did say 'antimatter that is speculated to exist in the
universe'. Thus this is a dead end for our antigravitational search in this
direction.

Let us now present three widely different principles of realistic antigravity
in increasing order of sophistication and effectiveness, and follow this with
three respective examples: 1) an atomic antimatter reactor, 2) subatomic
particle/field system, and 3) one operating on wave motion.

The third system that we shall describe satisfies the condition for the
ultimate spacecraft propulsion method and is one which utilises the principle
of attunement or resonance with the gravitational oscillation of the planet or
any cosmic body. This method is 4th-to-3rd dimensional and involves wave
motion.

The second system is also a genuine antigravity method which utilises control
over gravitational nodes, which means the gravitational field (see web-site
articles on superspace and gravity). This method operates more with 3rd-
dimensional components.

The first one we shall present harnesses the white-hole repulsive properties
of the centre of atoms. Let us now give three appropriate examples utilising
these principles, starting with the latter, the antimatter reactor. For this
example, any of the inert gases would be more effective than other elements.
The inert gas does not react chemically with any other element. It has a
stable structure of completed electron shells due to a powerful nodal force
within the nucleus.

If we subject the inert gas to high pressure and temperature we can strip away
the (negative) electrons surrounding the positively charged nucleus. The atoms
thus become highly ionised.

If we now apply a powerful magnetic field, the nucleus of the inert atoms,
consisting of protons and neutrons, is disturbed. Remember the fractal
principle we have discussed in other articles in which true wholeness exists
in its own right at different natural entity levels of the universe, for
example, a planet, solar system, or an atom, or even its nucleus. Thus by
disturbing or even removing any protons or neutrons does not remove the inner
white-hole property of the nucleus. Under these conditions these centres or
nodes of atoms are exposed--powerful energy is coming into our 3D. This is
quite compatible with quantum physics that tells us everything is under
continuous creation--this creative energy is coming into our reality to create
it, through natural entities, such as atoms. This is also the source of the
power of the atomic bomb--a neutron splits the nucleus, exposing the nodes of
the fissile material releasing huge quantities of 'white-hole' energy.
However, the magnetic field does not disturb the nucleus of the inert gases to
create this dangerous mode.

This outflow of energy from the central nodes of these exposed atomic nuclei
would push against any matter giving rise to repulsion. Thus this is a
potential method for creating a localised antigravitational field. This system
has apparently been achieved secretly, and since we haven't heard about it
publicly we can only assume it is the work of the secret government. But they
have more advanced systems than this now.

Let us now describe the second method which operates at the subatomic particle
level, but whereas the previous system creates an antigravitational field,
this one manipulates Earth's powerful gravitational field--or any other such
field in the cosmos.

This system has also been achieved by Earthman using electromagnetic
principles. The most notable pioneers in this field have been John Searle and
Otis Carr. Searle built many levity discs, some 10 feet or more in diameter.
His system was said to be based on an armature of two counter-rotating discs
at the perimeter of which were a series of stator electromagnets. The centre
was positively charged and the perimeter negatively charged. Many of his
discs, rising powerfully and vertically, could wrench out clumps of grass from
the ground--similar to some observed UFOs--and were lost in space.

He eventually succeeded in controlling them with radio frequencies. He also
had a similar generator providing free electricity to his home in the village
of Mortimer, England, until he was subject to a destructive raid by law
enforcement officers who confiscated his generator.

Otis Carr and company in the U.S had a similar experience and had actually
built a full-sized spacecraft (photographs were available). The government
confiscated it and threatened the company members with imprisonment if they
continued with their research.

Both these inventors were apparently creating a form of antigravity, which we
can speculate fairly positively was of the type in which a vortex of
gravitational nodes was formed. If one envisages a doughnut-shaped energy
configuration encompassing the disc, which is a scalar field, for a particular
rotation, gravitational nodes descending vertically under the force of gravity
would be swept around the disc and then underneath and upwards and round
again, delineating and penetrating the vortex region or toroid shape. With the
same principle as the twister and tornado, which can lift a vehicle, the
gravitational nodes coming up under the disc and resonating with the nodes of
atomic structure of the disc, would drag the levity disc upwards. Thus in this
example gravity is reversed. The spacecraft 'falls' up.

The educated will say this is a 'bootstrap' mechanism (one can't lift oneself
up by one's bootstraps because of the equality of action and reaction--
Newton's laws). However, gravitational-type fields do not obey Newton's laws
(see other web-site articles).

This is a method then which utilises gravitational nodes that normally drag a
body down to the surface of, for example, Earth, producing the gravitational
force when the body's motion is arrested. In this case, the nodes are
manipulated to move upwards, dragging the fixed nodes within the structure of
the craft, by resonance, upwards. By adjusting the direction and shape of the
vortex field the craft has complete maneuverability.

Now we come to the third example and ultimate propulsion system which does not
interfere with nature directly. The bodies of ET spacecrafts have been
referred to as made of crystalline or ceramic material. Some of these advanced
designs are apparently created in space using the psychokinetic powers of
several minds.

The most important special property of this material is that the frequencies
of the atoms can be easily entrained, that is, brought into coherence. A form
of scalar or quantum-wave generator, which produces a frequency spectrum
covering the frequencies of cosmic bodies, such as the Earth or Sun, will be
required to create the initial conditions (on a much more advanced level,
minds would do it and no controls would be required). The oscillations
emanating from the generator will be vortexual, encompassing the body of the
ship. By means of mode-locking, the atomic oscillations of the craft's body
will begin to match those of the generator frequencies until all atomic
frequencies of the ship are in phase (this would also include the interior of
the craft and occupants).

[As we have described in other articles, whenever the frequencies of parts (in
this case, the atoms) are put into phase, a collective whole is quantum
regenerated. That is, a whole single quantum-state oscillation is created from
what we might call a virtual-state matrix, which has a higher frequency (it is
more than the sum of the atomic frequencies).]

Thus the spacecraft is now creating a single high-frequency oscillation
encompassing the whole ship with all atomic frequencies within the ship in
step. The energy vortex of this oscillating entity is similar to that of a
planet, Sun, or any cosmic body, such as, to take the extremes, a galaxy or
universe, but these possess immensely high frequencies of which the craft may
not be capable.

The spacecraft interacting with a cosmic body is a little like two
electromagnets run by AC. If two such magnets are positioned each within the
field of the other and the frequencies are such that like poles are in step
there will be repulsion between the poles (as with two north poles or two
south poles of a permanent magnet).

However, it is not as simple as this. The oscillations of the fields of the
spacecraft and cosmic body are not only manifesting electromagnetic energies,
but scalar/quantum frequencies, which are higher-dimensional. We have a 4D-to-
3D interaction, and a more advanced spacecraft will utilise the higher-order
regions of the spectrum. What does this mean? It means the relationship
between the poles of the spacecraft and, say, a planet is 4th dimensional,
which we must imagine as interacting mainly internally, not externally.

To illustrate this, envisage the ship within the solar system and interacting
with the Sun's oscillations--which strictly embrace the whole space of the
solar system. Then the spacecraft's oscillations are inside the solar system's
oscillations. This means that interacting waves will operate on resonance,
predominantly. If the craft attunes its positive wave to the positive wave of
the Sun, they will not repel since one is inside the other. They attract, go
into resonance and will lock on in a manner to pull the ship towards maximum
intensity at the Sun's physical location.

At high efficiency this will not only be very powerful but free from inertia.
In fact the craft will not be pushed (as one does with Newtonian forces)
toward the Sun but will simply be wherever the Sun's wave is at any moment.
There is harmony between the two oscillating systems and it is not appropriate
to talk of mass, inertia, force or even kinetic or potential energy! There is,
of course, acceleration without force (violation of Newton's second law). When
a body acts holistically with its environment and the environment creates
motion of the body, there is no inertia to consider.

The spacecraft can thus move towards or away from a planet or star by
controlling phase angles of its frequencies relative to the frequencies of the
planet or sun. However, when the frequencies are either completely in phase
('attraction') or 180 degrees out of phase ('repulsion'), the velocity will be
very great owing to the extremely high frequencies of the planet (this has
nothing to do with the Schuman resonance) and even greater for our Sun. One
can estimate theoretically that this speed will be greater than the velocity
of light and by many times for interaction with the Sun. Before we explain how
the craft attains intermediate speeds and also how it moves laterally, let us
anticipate the relativity objection to the speed being greater than that of
light.

If the reader still wishes to remain faithful to the special theory of
relativity, which has been telling us that no object can go faster or as fast
as light (except the theoretical and never-found tachyons that only exist
beyond the speed of light), we should indicate that the special theory gives a
good representation of the illusions of the 3rd dimension. Nevertheless,
physicists overlook the fact that there is within the theory a 'contingency'
for faster than light travel (and not meaning tachyons). The observed body,
which is approaching the velocity of light (and therefore contracting along
its forward dimension into invisibility at the speed of light), from its point
of view, time slows down and at the velocity of light, time has stopped. But
just as the body has contracted from the outside-observer viewpoint, from the
viewpoint of the body, the environment has contracted, and thus at the speed
of light (as measured by the observer) there is no distance (from the
viewpoint of the body). Or, near to light velocity (as measured by the
observer), distance is much reduced and the object can be travelling faster
than light velocity from its point of view; and at infinite velocity at this
observed velocity of light. One might see that one is playing around with
illusions even though they are real (illusion means assigning wrong causes,
and exhibiting apparencies).

Now let us briefly explain how the ship's speed is controlled. This is
achieved by adjustment of the phase angle between the craft's oscillations and
the Sun's. This is like drawing the sine waves for each of the oscillations,
craft and Sun and superimposing them. If they are perfectly superimposed then
one has maximum attraction. However, if they are displaced anywhere from 0 to
180 degrees, one wave will counteract the other to different degrees
throughout the range, full attraction to full repulsion. Thus by means of the
resultant of the two waves any value of velocity can be determined. Note that
enormous accuracy is required in these settings, which would be achieved by
utilising the accurate oscillations of crystals (similar to the use of
crystals in our computers).

Now to maneuver the craft along the surface of the planet or cosmic body, in
addition to tilting the craft appropriately with some possible directional
manipulation of the vortex, the craft can fly along ley lines, that is, grid
vortices. Just as two pebbles dropped in a pond create ripples which interfere
to produce a grid pattern of oscillating regions (and cancelled regions) all
natural entities, Sun, planet, atom, etc. have interference patterns around
them. Where there is an interception point in which two waves reinforce one
another, a black-hole/white-hole oscillation occurs, that is, a 4D-to-3D
vortex acting perpendicular to our 3D plane.

Just as the spacecraft can utilise the cosmic bodies described above, it can
similarly attract and repel from these strings of vortex locations which form
the grid network of, say, a planet (in the case of an atom it forms the
interdimensional travel, which is achieved by matching frequencies to a
desired destination; all locations have different frequency patterns.

We have briefly described three methods which considerable research indicates
are in use either here on planet Earth or elsewhere in the cosmos. As a final
point one may consider that the antimatter reactor would only repel against
mass a short distance. But recognising that one pole, the white-hole of the
nodes, is inside the other pole, which is the gravitational field (compare the
3rd method described above), also that all energy is oscillating or cyclic,
then the positive aspect (outgoing) of the antimatter reactor will repel
against the negative (ingoing) gravitational flow continuously as it pushes
against the gravitational field, seeking the minimum gravitational intensity.

Another query with this system, might be that the reactor located under the
craft is a chamber and the wall nearest to Earth will be affected by the
repulsive force. Not really. Imagine an asteroid inside a large container a
few feet off the Earth's surface, the container's mass will 'merge' with the
mass of the asteroid, and the force of each mass--planet and asteroid--will
act on the container.

As a final point, the third system follows universal principles and is another
demonstration of the application of the ubiquitous components of nature's
computer system (see web-site articles).

TAKEN FROM THIS URL:

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/Antigravity.htm
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.