Re: [alternate-history] Re: No Hiroshima
>And the German population rises in massive resistance or face extermination
>2 If Koniev and Zhukov are heading for Paris. then all bets are off.
>if the Reds don't shoot you. The West will.
>The stakes just got a hell of a lot too high...
by the soviets. The west can buy land for time and then use their advantage
in ships to land forces behind the frontlines. The soviet airforce arent a
match for the USAAF or RAF imho. The tanks are better though
På MSN hittar du det roliga, intressanta och användbara på internet:
- They kill a lot of Russians. The Russians use gas (of which they had far more than anyone else) on Britain and on Allied forces (who had neither decent chem war gear or training) - this is why neither side used it in WW2 in Europe,.Scott----- Original Message -----From: Ruairi JSent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:30 PMSubject: [alternate-history] Re: No Hiroshima--- In alternate-history@y..., "scott palter" <agingcow2345@h...>
> To quote Monty when asked as NATO's first Central Front commander
what the Russians needed to march to the Channel:"Boots". There were
multimillion member Stalinist parties in France and Italy, still with
many of their guns from partisan days. There were not functional
Western militaries until the early 50's.
Looking at a book about Portnam Down the UK's Biological and chemical
``Defence'' establishment. Suppose in the event of a Soviet attack on
Western Europe. The Brits had decided all bets ware off, and use Gas
and Bio-weapons agasint Konievs hordes
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.