Re: Asp.Net Mvc Source Available
- First rule of Microsoft Internal Mocking Framework (from here on out
referred to as IMF) is that you do not talk about the IMF.
(See Also: "In Soviet Russia Internal Framework Mocks you.")
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Derik Whittaker" <graudowd@...>
> I have to ask this.
> Why was an 'internal' mocking framework created to begin with? Did
> the available ones at the time NOT get the job done? Or did the
> powers that be mandate it?
> Just asking, not trying to start a holy war.
> --- In email@example.com, Phil Haack <philha@> wrote:
> > We made use of an internal framework within our unit tests. We'd
> rather replace the places in which we used that with a more widely
> available OSS framework before releasing our unit tests. Otherwise
> nobody could run our tests.
> > And trust me, nobody wants us to release the internal framework we
> used. (By "internal" I mean something internal to MS, not something
> written by my team).
> > Phil
> > From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> On Behalf Of Tuna Toksöz
> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:02 AM
> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Re: [altdotnet] Asp.Net Mvc Source Available
> > Unfortunately, no unit tests. The reason was there were some
> internal libraries/classes/etc so that they wouldn't give it, they
> > Internals are everywhere :)
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Cláudio Figueiredo
> <jcfigueiredo@<mailto:jcfigueiredo@>> wrote:
> > Did they posted the UnitTests as well?
> > I'd rather have those instead of the SC, which I can browse with
> > Regards,
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:43 PM, jdn3times
> <jdn3times@<mailto:jdn3times@>> wrote:
> > http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/03/21/asp-net-mvc-
> > code-now-available.aspx
> > Let the flaming commence.
> > jdn
> > --
> > Claudio Figueiredo
> > jcfigueiredo@<mailto:jcfigueiredo@>
> > Stormwind Project Commiter - http://www.stormwindproject.org
> > --
> > Tuna Toksöz
> > Typos included to enhance the reader's attention ...
- I know this is all not technically relevant, but it sure is a good bit
--- In email@example.com, Bill Barry <after.fallout@...> wrote:
> And why did IMF remind me of this:
> tarinbvii wrote:
> > First rule of Microsoft Internal Mocking Framework (from here on
> > referred to as IMF) is that you do not talk about the IMF.
> > (See Also: "In Soviet Russia Internal Framework Mocks you.")
> > ::snicker::