19976Re: J.B. Kronk
- Sep 10 7:35 AMThanks, Pádraig.
--- In email@example.com, Pádraig Ó Méalóid <pomealoid@...> wrote:
> Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. Where would we be if we mocked people for asking perfectly reasonable questions? A group like this, as much as anything else, surely exists to help one another in their researches, rather than to discourage them. <br/><br/>As to the question: most places seem to attribute the story to Grant, rather than Moore. I don't know if George Khoury is still actively involved in Moore scholarship, so is quite possibly no longer on this list. And there are lots of old bibliographies for Moore, which are also going to contain a certain amount of error (which can happen for all sorts of reasons), which gets cleared up as research continues into them. And, considering that the 2000 AD website list the author as being Grant, I'd say you can probably take that as the official word. <br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
- << Previous post in topic