Re: [aima-talk] Compiler for Source in Text
- My understanding is that this goup if for discussions
directly pertaining to 'Artificial Intelligence: A
modern Approach' by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig.
Might this dicussion be better suited to
--- Serguei Mokhov <mokhov@...> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----=====
> From: "Will Deakin" <anisotropia9@...>
> Sent: September 20, 2002 5:44 PM
> > >Serguei Mokhov ha scritto:
> > > Not exactly LISP, but a subset.
> > Without meaning to be painfully pedantic, if you
> > by LISP (or lisp since this looks a bit quieter on
> > page :) that you are talking about common lisp --
> I wasn't talking about any particular flavour of
> > which I belive the examples to be implemented in
> > then, no, scheme is not "a subset" of lisp. There
> Okay, not a *proper* subset :)
> > If however, you mean by *a* "LISP," that scheme
> > trace ancedance from the early work by McCarthy
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Quamvis tam longo possis satur esse libello,
lector, adhuc a me disitcha pauca petis.
sed Lupus usuram puerique diaria poscunt.
Lector, solve. Taces dissimulasque? Vale.
--Marcus Valerius Martialis, liber XI, CVIII
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
- --- Owain Roberts <owain_roberts@...> ha
> My understanding is that this goup if forand
> discussions directly pertaining to 'Artificial
> Intelligence: A modern Approach' by Stuart Russell
> Peter Norvig.Yes. The answer I gave was in response to a thread as
to whether the aima code would run under scheme. I was
trying to explain why this was not so and that
there were a number of practical steps that could be
carried out to run the examples.
For completeness, I should have added that IIRC the
examples are also implemented in a number of other
languages. This would suggest a third approach of not
using lisp but java, say. However, I don't know enough
about this to be of any futher assistance.
Why is this not "on topic?" Unless, of course, the
first question was not.
> Might this dicussion be better suited toFurther dicussion (sic) would. Or any one of a number
of other places.
Mio Yahoo!: personalizza Yahoo! come piace a te