Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [aima-talk] possible typo: p633 2nd edition: "irrational to play a strongly dominated"

Expand Messages
  • The Geek
    You just misread it - dominated vs. dominant Strongly dominated strategy = a strategy that is strongly dominated by another, a.k.a one that sucks. Therefore it
    Message 1 of 2 , Jan 5, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      You just misread it - dominated vs. dominant

      Strongly dominated strategy = a strategy that is
      strongly dominated by another, a.k.a one that sucks.
      Therefore it is irrational to play a strongly
      dominated strategy.

      Rob Guiher

      --- Jim Davies <jim.davies@...> wrote:

      > This seems wrong to me, but I just wanted to make
      > sure. Fourth
      > paragraph on page 633 of the second edition it says
      >
      > "It is irrational to play a strongly dominated
      > strategy, and
      > irrational not to play a dominant strategy if one
      > exists."
      >
      > should probably say something like
      >
      > "It is rational to play a strongly dominated
      > strategy, and irrational
      > not to play a dominant strategy if one exists."
      >
      > JimDavies
      > http://www.jimdavies.org/
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >




      __________________________________________
      Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
      Just $16.99/mo. or less.
      dsl.yahoo.com
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.