787Re: [aima-talk] Re: Performance Measure
- Oct 2 12:20 AMOn Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Ravi Mohan wrote:
> > Which is correct? I emailed Ravi Mohan about that, but never receivedWeird. You're right, I did receive it, at least my mail server logs say
> > a response.
> I had replied to you as soon as I saw your email (The reply is
> duplicated below, Please note the date. Maybe your filters plonked it
> into your spam folder? )
so, but it wasn't trapped in my spam folder nor do I recall seeing it in
> > Since the Vaccum cleaner environment referred to in question 2.7Thanks, that explains a lot.
> > refers to the assumptions made on page 36, I am confused at how a
> > reward of ten points was associated with cleaning a location?
> See Section 3.2 (Example Problems) for where the path cost comes from. I
> am not sure where I got the performance measure of +10, but it looks
> reasonable to me.
> Feel free to alter it to whatever makes sense :-). Any value that is nx
> for n > 1 should work.
I'm still curious as to what the value of setting the performance penalty
to -1 where the reward is +1. It seems as if they'll simply cancel each
other out. Or perhaps I am over thinking it and missing the fact that
question 2.9 speaks from the standpoint of an agent that cannot possibly
maximize its performance measure.
"The idea that any one of us [presidential candidates] can bring about
this change is a fantasy, it is not the truth! We need you to bring about
the change on all these issues, we need you involved, we need you taking
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>