18662Re: [ai-philosophy] Archeology completely refutes Bible!
- Feb 17, 2014That means the best historical review of the matter was still in the Monty Python:On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:07 AM, <larry_tapper@...> wrote:
And no new result based on radiocarbon dating will impress the inerrantists anyway. They're already committed to dismissing that whole discipline, lest they be forced to admit that anything whatsoever is more than 6000 years old.
A couple of days ago I watched the video of the recent debate on evolution between Bill Nye (the Science Guy) and the Young Earth creationist Jack Ham:
Watch a few minutes and you'll see that Ham has a ready-made rebuttal to any argument of this sort --- nobody alive today was there to see it, so it's anybody's guess what really happened. This goes for th e age &n bsp;of camel remains as well as the evolution of mammals.
Eray Ozkural, PhD. Computer Scientist
Founder, Gok Us Sibernetik Ar&Ge Ltd.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>