18564Re: [ai-philosophy] RE: Proof of reductionism: short version
- Aug 30 10:37 AMI think it might be a curse of the church of Wittgenstein and its later saints such as SWM.
On Aug 30, 2013, at 5:22 PM, <calhorn@...> wrote:Eray, what the hell has happened to your group? Isn't there a 17th Century Philosophy forum where Leibniz's notions of teleology could be hotly debated?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, <erayo@...> wrote:On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@...> wrote:On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Eray Ozkural <erayo@...> wrote:The claim is in present tense which (obviously) refers to a future explanation not a past one.If DNA were the whole of the explanation, then reading it should reveal the explanation.If reading means understanding, yes, I of course mean that it determines the whole biochemical machinery.You also need the initial biochem. environment and theory of biochem. but I assume that's part of the explanation.Cheers,
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>