Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

GEOSTATS: Back transforming log-normal data

Expand Messages
  • John Kern
    I would have to dissagree with Pierre s difinitive You can t . If we make a probability statement such as Prob(ll
    Message 1 of 1 , May 11, 1998
      I would have to dissagree with Pierre's difinitive "You can't". If we make
      a probability statement such as Prob(ll < mu < ul) = 90%, (ie construct a
      confidence interval for the block mean of log transformed data) , then we
      are able to also make the probability statement Prob(f(ll) < f(mu) < f(ul))
      = 90% provided that the function f is a one to one function. In the case of
      log transformed data, the function we want here is the exponential and as
      Pierre notes we may corect for bias using s^2/2 or this can be refined
      slightly as mentioned by Cressie 1990 where the bias correction is
      porportional to s^2/2. If we do not correct for bias (ie use just the
      exponential function, then we have a confidence interval for the median
      exp(mu) of the lognormal distribution.

      In general the idea of back transforming the confdence limits is a fairly
      standard technique throughout the statistical literature.
      |Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. |
      |2003 Central Ave. |
      |Cheyenne, WY 82001 |
      |phone: 307-634-1756 |
      |fax: 307-637-6981 |
      |web: http://www.west-inc.com/ |

      *To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....
      *As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary
      of any useful responses to your questions.
      *To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and
      "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.
      DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list!
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.