- View SourceHello everyone,

I am a newbie to geostats (I have done a little stochastic work in

hydrogeology but not much else) community and I have a question for you

folks. I am interested in kriging a set of about 2100 borehole logs to

generate a 3D picture of the subsurface in a watershed. I have defined 19

separate classes of materials in the boreholes (sand, silt, gravel, etc.)

and am, at present, skipping making combinations of materials into a class

because I do not want to introduce any more uncertainty into the system (it

has enough already!). Anyway, I wanted to find an appropriate kriging

routine for this situation. The routine would only be allowed to use one of

the 19 defined classes for a value at any given point and can not

interpolate between defined classes. With this criteria in mind I chose

indicator kriging as the my desired method.

Now here is my questions/problems.

1) I would like to know if indicator kriging is the approach I should take.

2) I have a copy of the book GSLIB (1st edition) which has an indicator

kriging routine in it but it is a 2-parameter routine. I am wondering if

anyone knows where I can get my hands on a n-parameter indicator kriging

routine (preferably for free because I am just a poor humble PhD student)?

Thanks in advance for your help,

Jon Paul Jones

University of Waterloo

Department of Earth Sciences

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L-3G1

Phone: 519-888-4567 ext. 2984

Fax: 519-746-7484

"Just because you are paranoid does not mean that they are not all out to

get you."

--

*To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....

*As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary

of any useful responses to your questions.

*To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and

"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.

DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list! - View SourceHello Jon,

if you are not familiar with geometrical a n d geostatistical 3D-modelling

then I would emphatically recommend to look for an alternative approach to

your problem, i.e. correspondig to the scientific problem which you would like

to

analyse, e.g.

1. is it possible to reduce to 2D

2. can you transform classes of materials into hydro-geological relevant

parameters (porosity, permeability or K-values) so that you can

work with a single parameter in 3D space (which is difficult enough)

3.? etc

If you want to get a picture of the subsurface only then the relation

of scientific result/expenditure tends to zero.

Regards,

Heinz Burger

Jon Jones schrieb:

> Hello everyone,

--

> I am a newbie to geostats (I have done a little stochastic work in

> hydrogeology but not much else) community and I have a question for you

> folks. I am interested in kriging a set of about 2100 borehole logs to

> generate a 3D picture of the subsurface in a watershed. I have defined 19

> separate classes of materials in the boreholes (sand, silt, gravel, etc.)

> and am, at present, skipping making combinations of materials into a class

> because I do not want to introduce any more uncertainty into the system (it

> has enough already!). Anyway, I wanted to find an appropriate kriging

> routine for this situation. The routine would only be allowed to use one of

> the 19 defined classes for a value at any given point and can not

> interpolate between defined classes. With this criteria in mind I chose

> indicator kriging as the my desired method.

>

> Now here is my questions/problems.

> 1) I would like to know if indicator kriging is the approach I should take.

> 2) I have a copy of the book GSLIB (1st edition) which has an indicator

> kriging routine in it but it is a 2-parameter routine. I am wondering if

> anyone knows where I can get my hands on a n-parameter indicator kriging

> routine (preferably for free because I am just a poor humble PhD student)?

>

> Thanks in advance for your help,

>

> Jon Paul Jones

> University of Waterloo

> Department of Earth Sciences

> Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L-3G1

> Phone: 519-888-4567 ext. 2984

> Fax: 519-746-7484

> "Just because you are paranoid does not mean that they are not all out to

> get you."

>

> --

> *To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....

> *As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary

> of any useful responses to your questions.

> *To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and

> "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.

> DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list!

*****************************************************

Dr. Heinz Burger

Freie Universitaet Berlin

- Geoinformatik -

Malteserstr. 74-100

12249 BERLIN, Germany

Tel. (49) 30-838-70561 Fax: (49) 30-775-2075

e-mail: hburger@...-berlin.de

Web-Seite: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~hburger

****************************************************

--

*To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....

*As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary

of any useful responses to your questions.

*To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and

"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.

DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list! - View SourceHi Jon,

Indicator Kriging can work with as many classes as you want. At each grid node, it

will give the probability for each class. You would then need to extract the most

probable

class for each node, if you are after a categorical model. For the same amount of

modeling

efforts, Sequential Indicator Simulation can give you the categorical model by

sequential

Monte-Carlo sampling from those local probabilyties.

Both algorithms require a variogram model for each class and both are available in

GSLIB.

Gilles

Heinz Burger wrote:

> Hello Jon,

--

>

> if you are not familiar with geometrical a n d geostatistical 3D-modelling

> then I would emphatically recommend to look for an alternative approach to

> your problem, i.e. correspondig to the scientific problem which you would like

> to

> analyse, e.g.

>

> 1. is it possible to reduce to 2D

> 2. can you transform classes of materials into hydro-geological relevant

> parameters (porosity, permeability or K-values) so that you can

> work with a single parameter in 3D space (which is difficult enough)

> 3.? etc

>

> If you want to get a picture of the subsurface only then the relation

> of scientific result/expenditure tends to zero.

>

> Regards,

>

> Heinz Burger

>

> Jon Jones schrieb:

>

> > Hello everyone,

> > I am a newbie to geostats (I have done a little stochastic work in

> > hydrogeology but not much else) community and I have a question for you

> > folks. I am interested in kriging a set of about 2100 borehole logs to

> > generate a 3D picture of the subsurface in a watershed. I have defined 19

> > separate classes of materials in the boreholes (sand, silt, gravel, etc.)

> > and am, at present, skipping making combinations of materials into a class

> > because I do not want to introduce any more uncertainty into the system (it

> > has enough already!). Anyway, I wanted to find an appropriate kriging

> > routine for this situation. The routine would only be allowed to use one of

> > the 19 defined classes for a value at any given point and can not

> > interpolate between defined classes. With this criteria in mind I chose

> > indicator kriging as the my desired method.

> >

> > Now here is my questions/problems.

> > 1) I would like to know if indicator kriging is the approach I should take.

> > 2) I have a copy of the book GSLIB (1st edition) which has an indicator

> > kriging routine in it but it is a 2-parameter routine. I am wondering if

> > anyone knows where I can get my hands on a n-parameter indicator kriging

> > routine (preferably for free because I am just a poor humble PhD student)?

> >

> > Thanks in advance for your help,

> >

> > Jon Paul Jones

> > University of Waterloo

> > Department of Earth Sciences

> > Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L-3G1

> > Phone: 519-888-4567 ext. 2984

> > Fax: 519-746-7484

> > "Just because you are paranoid does not mean that they are not all out to

> > get you."

> >

> > --

> > *To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....

> > *As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary

> > of any useful responses to your questions.

> > *To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and

> > "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.

> > DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list!

>

> --

> *****************************************************

> Dr. Heinz Burger

> Freie Universitaet Berlin

> - Geoinformatik -

> Malteserstr. 74-100

> 12249 BERLIN, Germany

> Tel. (49) 30-838-70561 Fax: (49) 30-775-2075

> e-mail: hburger@...-berlin.de

> Web-Seite: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~hburger

> ****************************************************

>

> --

> *To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....

> *As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary

> of any useful responses to your questions.

> *To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and

> "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.

> DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list!

**************************************************

Gilles Bourgault RC Squared Inc.

Senior Geostatistician 9177 East Mineral Circle

E-mail: gilles@... Suite 100

Phone: 303-749-7962 Englewood CO 80112

/RRR CCC\ 2 USA

| RRR C | http://www.rc2.com

\R R CCC/ Fax : 303-749-7970

**************************************************

--

*To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@....

*As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary

of any useful responses to your questions.

*To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@... with no subject and

"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body.

DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list!