Re: Cross post - incremental delivery and user priorities
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Jeff Patton" <jpatton@a...>
> Identify weight for your user roles/personas/profiles - whateverBeautiful! These are exactly the kinds of tips I need!
> approach you use to descrbe users. Maybe weight is a better word
> than priority. Focus on things like frequency of use and business
> value for the tasks they perform. That may be a more neutral way
> to establish weight so that folks don't get the inference that "we
> like those people better than you people."
> Ann: in the question you posted, do those groups share the sameCurrently, in one of the legacy applications, the 'viewers' have a
> UI/Interaction Context? - Or do they have their own separate UI?
static HTML view that is completely separate from the 'doer'
Java/Swing view. When I first saw this, I thought it very odd
because I was so used to designing screens that encompassed both
tasks. However, the longer that I'm here, the more I can see the
sensibility in separating the two tasks.
Also, it seems to fit nicely into the agile, iterative way of
thinking - i.e. we can do this screen during iteration X, and that
screen during iteration X+1. The viewers can still view information
from the 'doers' screens, the screens just aren't designed optimally
Thanks for the cross-posting as well. This is all starting to come
together in my head - slowly but surely ;)