Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: A case study in the making

Expand Messages
  • tmfspeck
    ... posting, but it has been an irritant for me and other fellow developpers. It pertains to your use of the word design in the following sentences, without
    Message 1 of 6 , Jul 5, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      > I have a point to make which does not pertain directly to your
      posting, but it has been an irritant for me and other fellow
      developpers. It pertains to your use of the word "design" in the
      following sentences, without prefacing it with a word
      like "interaction"

      Hi Alain,

      Point taken, and I'll actually take your quibble one step further to
      help illustrate my point: Several of us in the "design group" are
      actually designers on several levels: My title is "interaction
      designer" (literally architecting interaction), but I also do a fair
      amount of graphical design (UI) work as well - layouts, fonts,
      colors, etc. To further complicate matters, the entire development
      team has weekly "design meetings" at which code structure/flow,
      database issues, and ui concerns are hashed out. My apologies that
      the terms blur - they blur here as well, as we struggle to find job
      and task titles that are more descriptive and more specific.

      Far from giving the web developers short shrift, or claiming "DESIGN"
      as my domain, my teammates and I rely upon and support each other to
      truly "design" the finished product in every sense of the word.

      I realize, however, that such imprecision can be confusing when
      talking about our internal structure here in a more public forum, and
      I'll try to more clearly define my role(s), and those of my teammates
      when discussing specifics. I hope that by doing so, I can move
      quickly from academic definitional questions to those that will help
      me and my team successfully meld Usability and Agile.

      I meant no offense to web developers, especially those upon whom I
      rely <g>.

      Thanks for your thoughts,

      Kurt Morris
      Interaction Designer
      The Motley Fool
      http://www.fool.com
    • Kevin Narey
      ... It s right and fitting that you mention this Alain, because it really is a difficult problem and is anything but trivial. Unfortunately it is likely to be
      Message 2 of 6 , Jul 5, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        On 7/5/05, Desilets, Alain <alain.desilets@...> wrote:

        > Sorry if this looks like a trivial peeve, but it has been bothering me for a while.

        It's right and fitting that you mention this Alain, because it really
        is a difficult problem and is anything but trivial. Unfortunately it
        is likely to be around for some time to come, but we can console
        ourselves that we share a common goal (and this is often lost sight of
        in the melee): We want to help deliver great solutions.

        Kevin
      • Desilets, Alain
        I will tell you too, Alain, that we interaction designers often feel a sense of being in the minority. We struggled for some time just to be allowed to call
        Message 3 of 6 , Jul 6, 2005
        • 0 Attachment
          I will tell you too, Alain, that we interaction designers often feel a sense of being in the minority. We struggled for some time just to be allowed to call what we do design, so we may sometimes use the word in a chauvinistic sense. That is certainly what Cooper chose to do in Inmates, but for him it was a rhetorical strategy to put interaction design on the map.

          -- Alain:
          I hang around with and work closely with many interaction design people so I understand their pain. There are many developpers out there (few agilists I would hope) who even today, believe that usability is just a matter of slapping a GUI over a backend.

          But the solution to this impass is certainly not to turn things around and advocate that we should be designing the GUI and then just slap a backend underneath it. Yet this is exactly what Cooper proposes in "Inmates". Advocating such a process can only piss-off those "unenlightened" developpers and get them even more set in their ways. The solution, as you and I obviously agree, is for interaction designers and developpers to engage in continuous day-to-day cooperative problem solving.

          BTW: This is exactly what has happened with Agile and testing. QA people used to feel like their message didn't get across to developpers. There were all kinds of misconceptions on both sides of the fence. QA people felt that programmers didn't care about quality, whereas programmers felt that QA people didn't understand the pressures of code writing and meeting deadlines. But Agile methods (XP in particular) solved the issue by bringing testers into the trenches and having them collaborate on a day to day basis with developpers. As a result, developpers in an XP team tend to be much more sympathetic to quality issues, and in fact, they litterally live by unit testing. And yes, there is still room in XP teams for testing specialists, who can advise developpers on how to write good test and who do independent testing.

          I'm glad to see that many interaction designers are taking a similar approach and I trust that it will completely change the way developpers think about and react to issues of usability.
          ----
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.