7156RE: [agile-usability] Product Owner models for distributed teams?
- Sep 15, 2010
William has given you one very good way to proceed.
We’ve take a different path. We have assigned a dev manager at the remote location to be the Proxy PO. And the “Lead” PO is remote to the team. The co-located Proxy PO is mainly responsible for hour by hour local input to the team. We are also dealing with a large timezone gap.
On 09/15/2010 03:28 PM, allisonweiss wrote:
> We have a distributed team where everyone but the business resides and works together in one state and the business is in another state, 2 hours later. There has been a significant change in personnel in the business and there is very little in terms of 'subject matter expertness' and/or agile Product Ownership skills. Conversely, the development/testing team has had very little turnover recently. While they are relatively new at scrum and not complete business SME's, there is a lot of product knowledge on the team.
> Any suggestions on how to fill our product owner role in this environment?
In my view, it's vital to have somebody in the room who can speak
authoritatively about the product. So in your shoes I'd probably take
the most experienced, broad-thinking tester and make them de facto
product manager, treating the far-off businesspeople like external
stakeholders. In effect, this would make your collocated team a small
development company, with one very important customer.
That would allow you to isolate your team from the chaos and keep them
productive while you figure out the right long-term relationship with
the business stakeholders. Maybe they'll get involved and come out every
other week, in which case your local product manager mainly acts as an
information cache and reporting agent. Maybe they'll neglect you,
benignly or otherwise, in which case your product manager will have wide
latitude. Either way, you'll be isolated from the productivity-sapping
effect of distant, possibly unhelpful overlords.
Confidentiality notice: This message may contain confidential information. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person, you should not use this message. We request that you notify us by replying to this message, and then delete all copies including any contained in your reply. Thank you.
- << Previous post in topic