I see your point, and your comment makes me take a different opinion.
My comment isn't really about her fashion, etc., but of her mood, or
emotional state. It just seemed to me she might be down, bummed, or
just plain irritated by the photogs. Either way, I happy she's happy,
and content, and not letting photogs ruin things all the time. Tammie

--- In addictedtomeg@yahoogroups.com, "Cathy" <SnowyHome@...> wrote:
>
> Tammie wrote: It seem like, when she's in public, on a normal day,
she
> seems like she doesn't care about her appearence, or anything. She
> seems down. That's just my opinion.
>
> Hi Tammie and Everyone,
>
> I've never posted on the group but I wanted to comment on what
> Tammie wrote. I had a different impression. When I see pictures of
> Meg in public, "on a normal day", she seems to be enjoying being
very
> normal and doing ordinary things. (some of the pictures may show
> annoyance when she is with her children and being spotted by
> photographer though.) I think in regard to her appearances, she is
> one star who does not define herself by what she wears nor how
> fasionable she is. I think she has said that fashion is not
something
> she is aware of. I think that is one of the things I realy like
about
> Meg..... she is more a person than a fashion symbol. Her values are
> very different than the average movie star. I know she has said
that
> she goes on retreat to India every year and has studied the Advaita
> teacher, Balsekar. I think her focus is on the spiritual dimension.
> She often says she likes being the "witness" which is a part of
> Advaita teachings.
> I think when in public she looks very real and not posed or all
> made-up the way other actress are. I know she is serious about her
> acting work but I don't think even that defines her. Who she is
seems
> to be more important to her than what she does.
> Only my opinion and only my perceptions. Its just the way I
sense
> her.
>
> Cathy
>