Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Music machine.

Expand Messages
  • tgalloca
    I don t know...his review is about an 8. He is usually very blunt if he does not like something. I have most of his books. His negative reviews are always fun
    Message 1 of 3 , Feb 4, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      I don't know...his review is about an 8. He is usually very blunt if
      he does not like something. I have most of his books. His negative
      reviews are always fun to read.

      --- In academyofanvil@yahoogroups.com, "xcygnusxyyzx"
      <xcygnusxyyzx@y...> wrote:
      >
      > Probably wasnt his idea to give it 8.5 out of 10, Imagine giving those
      > Giants a bad review?
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In academyofanvil@yahoogroups.com, "Elaine" <stevelaine@v...> wrote:
      > > We often talk about reviewers and there's one that I respect a lot;
      > Martin Popoff. However, when I read his last review about Judas
      > Priest's "Angel of retribution", I ask myself big questions. It's a
      > long review and if I refer to his comments, the rating 8.5/10 is not
      > proportional to his satisfaction toward the album.
      > >
      > > http://www.bravewords.com/hardwares.html
      > >
      > > I mean, 8.5/10 is almost a perfect album and what he wrote isn't
      > "almost perfect". I wonder if sometimes the reviewers aren't working
      > for Cd's stores. I wouldn't be surprised of such a rating coming from
      > a beginner. This guy got numerous books written about rock music, he's
      > well know and rated this album 8.5/10.......even he found major
      > faults. Curious...
      > >
      > > tange
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.