Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: BWBK review - I found it!

Expand Messages
  • thehelion
    I couldn t agree with you more. Even Iced Earth is now banning BWBK from attending any of their shows because of the inaccurate stuff that BWBK prints. Like
    Message 1 of 6 , Jun 15, 2004
      I couldn't agree with you more. Even Iced Earth is now banning BWBK
      from attending any of their shows because of the inaccurate stuff
      that BWBK prints. Like Iced Earth says "the magazine needs the band
      to sell magazines but the band doesn't need the magazine to sell cds"
      Tim and his followers are all goofs.

      --- In academyofanvil@yahoogroups.com, "Elaine" <tangelaine2000@y...>
      wrote:
      > By...Henderson? Well, I've read it and he repeats just .... what
      the
      > other stupidities that I've read. He doesn't talk about anything
      > positive, like the guitars and the melody. But.....he seems too
      > concerned about Viagra, HA!! How can you pretend to be the "boss"
      of
      > a magazine when you don't even listen to the music but only read
      the
      > lyrics? How can you take seriously a magazine that announced "Lee
      > Aaron give birth to a baby girl" when she doesn't even make any
      rock
      > n roll songs... Did he listen to what she makes now...she's not
      Diana
      > Krall, ha? What is the point "the baby girl" with the music? It was
      > in the NEWS! Henderson should continue to take his Viagra, have a
      > good fuck and shut up or ... a five knuckle shuffle!
      >
      > Tange
    • tgalloca
      At the risk of sounding unpopular. I like the BW&BK mag. As for the reviews. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I hate loits of CDs that I m sure others
      Message 2 of 6 , Jun 16, 2004
        At the risk of sounding unpopular. I like the BW&BK mag. As for the
        reviews. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I hate loits of CDs
        that I'm sure others love. It's all a matter of persoanl taste.

        I love BTB...

        As for the Iced Earth thing. I think Jon is being a goof. I think he
        overreacted to the interview. I don't like Bush and Jon seems to be
        his biggest fan. But that's politics. Jon being a warmonger doesn't
        make him any less talented of a musician.

        --- In academyofanvil@yahoogroups.com, thehelion <no_reply@y...>
        wrote:
        > I couldn't agree with you more. Even Iced Earth is now banning BWBK
        > from attending any of their shows because of the inaccurate stuff
        > that BWBK prints. Like Iced Earth says "the magazine needs the band
        > to sell magazines but the band doesn't need the magazine to sell
        cds"
        > Tim and his followers are all goofs.
        >
      • Elaine
        ... the ... You don t sound unpopular at all. We all know you and you re always frank. You built your site in a very honnest and rational way. Good and bad
        Message 3 of 6 , Jun 16, 2004
          --- In academyofanvil@yahoogroups.com, tgalloca <no_reply@y...> wrote:
          > At the risk of sounding unpopular. I like the BW&BK mag. As for
          the
          > reviews.

          You don't sound unpopular at all. We all know you and you're always
          frank. You built your site in a very honnest and rational way. Good
          and bad reviews, you show all. The links for every bars and every
          bands that are on the front page...we always know that you don't hide
          anything. You are logical.

          The difference between you and Henderson is that you don't publish
          some articles or some reviews that could influence the "sales".
          Don't you look at the reviews before to buy an album? I'm not talking
          about Anvil...If it's just a personal point of view that they
          publish, why people refer to this magazine to buy an albums?

          If someone wants to know all the story of Anvil, the best site is
          yours because it tells absolutely all. When a magazine is only
          negative about an album that other reviewers liked a lot "months ago"
          (it's listed on your site), I just think it's not correct and
          unhonnest. From there, I can't figure out how they can be a good
          magazine. Is it logical for a redactor to make a very bad review to
          Anvil (it looked personal), and to publish that Lee Aaron had a baby
          when it's a magazine about rock music? Would you set on your front
          page "Official now: a TRIUMPH reunion!" ?.

          Your site is about Anvil...you set only things that are about Anvil.
          Do Bw&Bk publishes only about rock music....the topics are they
          always about music? Rolling Stone Magazine is only made of adds
          now...There's nothing interesting to read. When I want to know about
          music now, I go on the web. Rory Gallagher, The Sweet, etc...because
          at least I don't waste my money....and the "Google Bar" blocks the
          popups. I would prefer to read all the BTB's reviews listed on your
          site before to make my mind! Moreover, it saves the trees...You're
          not unpopular, you're transparent which is not the case with some
          magazine's redactor...and President!

          Tange
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.