Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Please Allow Me To Introduce Myself

Expand Messages
  • John George
    Oh I quite agree there s much more than that...I m just thinking those factors amount to a sort of lowest common denominator. Standard disclaimers apply, of
    Message 1 of 3 , Jun 30, 2007
      Oh I quite agree there's much more than that...I'm just thinking those
      factors amount to a sort of lowest common denominator. Standard
      disclaimers apply, of course: subject to profound revision at the
      drop of a hat }:-)>

      You just have fun with that riding crop. My safe word is "INRI".


      --- In abramelin@yahoogroups.com, "Nightshade BelladonaAtropina"
      <oipteaapdoce@...> wrote:
      > Welcome to the Abramelin list John, glad to see you here :).
      > Y'know, I don't think imagination, will and symbolic action make up even
      > half of magics... but that is just me, different styles/systems and
      so on.
      > Not doing Abramelin anytime soon? *Gets out the riding crop and
      tells you
      > to get to it <g>*.
      > Anyways, the Dehn book is quite good, and included a lot that the French
      > translation doesn't. Well that and Dehn adds his fascinating travel and
      > other stories to the back of the book. Really interesting about
      Araki and
      > so on. There is also that extra chapter of spells that just isn't
      in the
      > French/Mathers edition...
      > Athena
      > --
      > www.enochian.org
      > On 6/30/07, John W. George <georgejo@...> wrote:
      > >
      > > Greetings,
      > >
      > > Now that I've contributed to a discussion I guess I should say
      > > about
      > > myself.
      > >
      > > I've been lurking on this group for quite some time now, just
      recently got
      > > around to reading all the archives. Some of you may recognize my
      name from
      > > "Ritual Magic", "Solomonic", "Evocational Magics", &c.
      > >
      > > Been studying Magic for most of my life now, and Abramelin is one
      of the
      > > first
      > > things I read. I have to admit, I'm not very well-disciplined, so
      > > I
      > > have a little more experience to my credit than your typical armchair
      > > type, I
      > > have a spotty track record as far as success is concerned. Let's
      just say
      > > that
      > > I don't need to believe, because I know, that it's possible to make
      > > synchronicity happen through the proper application of
      imagination, will,
      > > and
      > > symbolic action. It's also possible for this to go very
      "poetically" awry.
      > > I
      > > tentatively acknowledge that the Abramelin operation is an exercise in
      > > Bhakti
      > > Yoga that makes it possible to connect with Something that can
      keep this
      > > "poetically awry" to a minimum. But at this point in my life I'm
      > > near
      > > able to put it into practice without compromising its requirements
      out of
      > > recognition.
      > >
      > > I just recently scored the new Dehn version of Abramelin and will
      > > be
      > > asking questions based on it, if others don't beat me to it.
      > >
      > > JG
      > >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.