Re: [Y-Mail] Re: SpamGuard Plus
- No spam here, so to me Spam Guard Plus works pretty fine
Mario Sergio.----- Original Message ----
From: morac1974 <Anonymous123@...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:31:11 AM
Subject: [Y-Mail] Re: SpamGuard Plus
As someone who pays for Yahoo Mail and therefore gets Spamguard Plus I
can tell you that it's not all that great. I'd say that lately it
blocks about 85% of the spam I receive (most of the spam getting
through is spam from Yahoo and GMail users). You can compare that to
what you get with the free version.
This is how Yahoo describes Spam Guard Plus:
"[SpamGuard Plus] actually "learns" what you consider spam, and uses
that knowledge to determine which messages to allow. And which to
boot. The more you teach SpamGuard Plus, the better it will work for you."
From my experience SpamGuard Plus does not work as described above.
If it did then if I tagged the same message as spam day after day, it
should stop showing up in my mailbox relatively quickly (especially if
I get the same spam messages many times per day). In the past I
received the same spam message literally hundreds of times over a few
week period and tagged every single one as "spam". Spam Guard Plus
never figured out that that message was spam, even months later.
Compared this to anti-spam products which learn very quickly
--- In Y-Mail@yahoogroups.com, "mfm_ii" <mfm_ii@...> wrote:
> I am hoping I can find someone who will commiserate with me.
> I will admit my Yahoo! account is my throw-away account. I give it out
> every time some jerk wants to contact me. And that policy has earned
> me a lot of spam. But in my defense the spam is where I want it: not
> in my real Inbox.
> I guess the part that confuses me is that it does not have to be this
> way. Yahoo! has SpamGuard Plus which claims to block a lot more spam
> than SpamGuard (the basic offering). But SpamGuard Plus is only
> available to users who pay Yahoo! (what I call protection money) to
> upgrade their account. In other words, give us money or eat a ton of
> spam. And in my case it is ridiculous. Now I am not saying I should
> get something for nothing (despite having a free E-mail account paid
> for by advertising and training their "real" spam filter by naively
> tagging all that crap
> But don't you think it would be in everyone's best interest if all
> Yahoo! mail users got working spam protection in the form of SpamGuard
> Plus? Having a spam filter that worked would put more eyes on their
> ads, which would net them more money than charging for SpamGuard Plus.
> Let me know what you think.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: