Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: FOP not W3C compliant????

Expand Messages
  • virgul4u
    Hi, Thanks for your fast reply Chris! Ok I understand know, I don t have understand this like that! ok for me is not a problem!!! If it only that! And I know
    Message 1 of 3 , May 23 2:25 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi,

      Thanks for your fast reply Chris!

      Ok I understand know, I don't have understand this like that!

      ok for me is not a problem!!! If it only that!

      And I know you work hard for make FOP W3C compliant! so I'm patient
      and I wish to your group good luck!

      Thanks

      ++

      Thierry


      --- In XSL-FO@yahoogroups.com, Chris Bowditch <bowditch_chris@h...>
      wrote:
      > virgul4u wrote:
      > > Hi,
      > >
      > > I have receive a mail from a man from RenderX he says that FOP
      is not
      > > W3C compliant? Is it true?
      >
      > It is true that FOP implements less of the W3C specification
      compared with
      > RenderX XEP. However, there are some features that XEP doesnt yet
      implement.
      > And I dont believe there is any FO Formatter that implements 100%
      of the
      > specification.
      >
      > >
      > > In what degrees is FOP not compliant?
      >
      > This is shown here:
      >
      > http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html
      >
      > Chris
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.