RE: [XSL-FO] Welcome to member No.100 on XSL-FO group
- Pollington, Lee (ELSLON) writes:
> On a similar note, I'd like people's opinion on a number of statements inWell, I think all the implementors would agree that the Candidate
> the RenderX's documentation to the effect that they found XSL-FO candidate
> recommendation to be lacking and/or nonsensical when it came to
Recommendation is not really good enough. On the other hand, I for one
have actually worked on improving it much, so I cannot really throw
stones at the WG.
> I've searched for a good comprehensive tutorial (with examples) on XSL-FO,the (updated) FO chapter of Harold's XML Bible is good.
> but have not found what I need, so any suggestions would be appreciated.
otherwise, study the FOP and RenderX example files.