RE: [XSL-FO] Re: Table Cells Split
- I am using
with FOP 0.20.5 and it does what you intended. Although, I am putting
the whole table into a single row (as nested table) because I want to
avoid the table to break over pages. But basically, this works.
Applied Predictive Technologies
***This electronic message transmission contains information from Applied
Predictive Technologies, Inc. (APT) which may be confidential or privileged.
The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email
immediately. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
that do not relate to the official business of APT shall be understood as
neither given nor endorsed by it.***
From: hoenis [mailto:shoenigman@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: [XSL-FO] Re: Table Cells Split
Thanks for the assistance... Unfortunately I am using the latest
version of FOP (fop-0.20.5) and it doesn't appear to support the
keep-together attribute... I guess it is allright, I just thought that
it would appear more professional if it were not split across pages.
Maybe the next release will address this issue...
--- In XSL-FO@yahoogroups.com, Ryan Graham <ryan.graham@a...> wrote:
> >Hi everybody, I am a long-time listener, but a first-time caller.
> >Using fo I created a table that consists of a variable number of rows
> >(I have no control over the exact size of the table or the text
> >contained within it). When the table flows over to another page it
> >will split the cells between the two pages. I want to ensure that the
> >cells never split and that any row that would force a split is
> >rendered completely on the next page. Is there an easy way to do this?
> <fo:table-row keep-together.within-page="always">
> I haven't tested this, but in theory it should work.
> Also note that this is formatter specific. If you are using FOP,
> there is currently no support for any keep-together properties. XEP
> support them though. Not sure about the others, but check your
> documentation if you aren't using one of the above mentioned.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>Hey guys, thanks for the help, I have finally figured it out and gotI guess FOP just doesn't support the extended properties of keep-together
>it to work. I just checked the documentation for FOP and it indicated
>that it does support the keep-together property. The syntax though is
> <table-row keep-together="always">
(i.e. within-line, within-page, etc.). I didn't realize there was limited
support for this now, as I haven't used FOP in ages.