Re: [XSL-FO] XEP 3.1
- Hi Kevin,
see comments below
>From: "klobwork <kevin.obrien@...>" >Yes, it is reliable, and has not crashed for us. It is a lot slower than
>Can anyone who is using XEP 3.1 from a Java server program give me
>evaluation information about it? Is it reliable and sturdy (does it
>crash a lot, e.g.)? Is it fast, per transformation? Can it handle
>large XML files (perhaps by using a SAX parser)? Can it handle
>errors in an usable manner? Does it support a lot of the XSL:FO
>basic functionality? How about the more unusual functionality?
FOP, about 3 times longer per page in fact. However, it can do a lot more,
support for keeps being the biggest advantage. Error handling is good, you
can trap warnings/errors as events through the java API. It supports about
90% of XSL-FO functionality. FOP is probably about 60-65%
>I would especially like to hear from people not directly associatedI believe thats right.
>with the company (unless directing me to the the location of
>It appears that the Java API is not exposed unless you buy the
>developers edition (or better).
Surf together with new Shared Browsing