Re: [XSL-FO] Formatting Objects considered harmful (Was: Using an XSL Formatt...
- At 05:46 PM 19/02/2001 -0500, AndrewWatt2001@... wrote:
I was unimpressed by your opinion piece the first time I read it and spotted
>the errors in it. I see no reason, so far, to change my view.Andrew, I can't say I've been as riveted to this exchange as I could have
been (say, the first time around 6 or 12 months ago) but I don't recall
your itemizing the errors or proposing alternative views. If I missed your
reasoned response, I'd be grateful if you could review it quickly for me
either via the list or off-line.
On the other hand if you are still reacting to the remark about smoking...
whatever that came in Hakon's first response to your (rather dated) item on
Antenna House, it may have been an attempt at humour that didn't make it
across the Atlantic Ocean or the idiomatic gap between Scandinavian and
North American versions of English. No need for prolonged heat and smoke
Finally, if there is some other antecedent reason for the smoke, I'd
suggest it be taken off line and buried somewhere in the bit bucket.