Re: [XSL-FO] Common sense vs. verbatim interpretation of the
> > > >be worded as such,Should a marker be hot when the fo:marker is a descendant of a fo:basic-link,
> > >
> > > Yet so many in the industry are expecting the entire contents of the basic
> > > link to be hot (i.e. the contained areas) and not just the basic link
> > (i.e.
> > > the containing area).
> > >
> >Should footnotes anchored inside a basic-link be hot?
> Why not? But I take your point, and it is a good one. Indeed one could
> make the argument for only normally flowed areas, but again only based on
> common sense and not on the reading of the specification.
> I'm anxious to see what the errata will have to say (as yet empty):
or fo:retrieve-marker, or both?