Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [XSL-FO] Common sense vs. verbatim interpretation of the

Expand Messages
  • David Tolpin
    ... Should a marker be hot when the fo:marker is a descendant of a fo:basic-link, or fo:retrieve-marker, or both? David
    Message 1 of 17 , Aug 24 5:49 AM
      > > > >be worded as such,
      > > >
      > > > Yet so many in the industry are expecting the entire contents of the basic
      > > > link to be hot (i.e. the contained areas) and not just the basic link
      > > (i.e.
      > > > the containing area).
      > > >
      > >
      > >Should footnotes anchored inside a basic-link be hot?
      >
      > Why not? But I take your point, and it is a good one. Indeed one could
      > make the argument for only normally flowed areas, but again only based on
      > common sense and not on the reading of the specification.
      >
      > I'm anxious to see what the errata will have to say (as yet empty):
      >
      > http://www.w3.org/2001/10/REC-XSL-20011015-errata
      >

      Should a marker be hot when the fo:marker is a descendant of a fo:basic-link,
      or fo:retrieve-marker, or both?

      David
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.