- Hello! Other java xsl-fo implementations certanly exist, see full list at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/, but I wouldn t say anyone is significantly better thanMessage 1 of 4 , May 25, 2002View SourceHello!Other java xsl-fo implementations certanly exist, see full list at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/, but I wouldn't say anyone is significantly better than another one because as usual "it depends", they all have own merits and demerits.I believe iText being focused mainly on pdf creation and manipulation is a good choice to those who need full control over resulting pdf file and I'm not sure iText supports all that high-quality publishing stuff xsl-fo is focused on, they are declaring "The iText classes are very useful for people who need to generate read-only, platform independent documents containing text, lists, tables and images." only.
Multiconn International, Israel-----Original Message-----Has anyone on this list list looked into comparing iText XML vs. XSL-
From: mpopovits.rm [mailto:michelle.popovits@...]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:30 PM
Subject: [XSL-FO] iTextXml vs. XSL-FO
FO for rendering PDF documents from XML using XSL? Does one stand
out or are they basically equal?
Also, I've done some work with FOP in a Java environment. I have
noticed that there are some limitations, are there other java xsl-fo
implementations that are significantly better than FOP?
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.